On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
>> I don't really see the benefit in this. Either you combine forwarding
>> tables into one table, or you... well, that's actually it. I guess the
>> larger part is more on a control plane level than on a data
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> I don't really see the benefit in this. Either you combine forwarding
> tables into one table, or you... well, that's actually it. I guess the
> larger part is more on a control plane level than on a data plane
> level, so that would more be a xorp project, I gu
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, March 5, 2009 1:36 am, Archimedes Gaviola wrote:
Hi Justin,
Just want to suggest and share this idea (without mentoring) about
virtual routing based on this link here
http://www.ipinfusion.com/pdf/VirtualRouting_app-note_3rev0302.pdf.
Although I'm not so sure i
On Thu, March 5, 2009 1:36 am, Archimedes Gaviola wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Just want to suggest and share this idea (without mentoring) about
> virtual routing based on this link here
> http://www.ipinfusion.com/pdf/VirtualRouting_app-note_3rev0302.pdf.
> Although I'm not so sure if this is already
There has been several developers stating that they are using qemu on
DragonFly, but I don't think that users and other developers have seen
any working qemu on DragonFly ;(. There was also the problem with qemu
needing GCC3.
Qemu 0.10.0 was released yesterday:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html
