Re: pkg_dry on DragonFlyBSD

2009-05-09 Thread Hasso Tepper
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: Like kqemu it's a kernel module with only one client, kqemu is only used by qemu and the DRM kernel module is only used by the Xorg server. They are both bridge modules with one end of their interfaces determined by the client (and thus not under the control of the

pkgsrc-HEAD DragonFly 2.3/i386 2009-05-05 04:50

2009-05-09 Thread Hasso Tepper
pkgsrc bulk build report DragonFly 2.3/i386 Compiler: gcc Build start: 2009-05-05 04:50 Build end: 2009-05-09 07:25 Full report: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~hasso/pbulk-logs/20090505.0450/meta/report.html Machine readable version:

Re: pkg_dry on DragonFlyBSD

2009-05-09 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 9 May 2009 10:08:16 +0300 Hasso Tepper ha...@estpak.ee wrote: Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: Like kqemu it's a kernel module with only one client, kqemu is only used by qemu and the DRM kernel module is only used by the Xorg server. They are both bridge modules with one end of their

Re: pkg_dry on DragonFlyBSD

2009-05-09 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: There may well come a time for either of these where there are two incompatible versions extant supporting two actively used versions of their client (think around a major version bump). It would be much easier to

Re: pkg_dry on DragonFlyBSD

2009-05-09 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 9 May 2009 15:15:48 +0200 Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: There may well come a time for either of these where there are two incompatible versions extant supporting two actively used versions