Re: HAMMER:WARNING: Missing inode for dirent

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I am getting these errors when I run undo update.log : :HAMMER: WARNING: Missing inode for dirent update.log@@0x0001166e7da0 :obj_id = 000103bca45e, asof=0001166e7da0, lo= :HAMMER: WARNING: Missing inode for dirent update.log@@0x000116a785c0 :obj_id =

Re: Hammer clean up doesn't actually remove snapshots?

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Thomas Nikolajsen thomas.nikolaj...@mail.dk wrote: .. prune softlink-dir             Prune the file system based on previously created snapshot soft-             links.  Pruning is the act of deleting file system history.  The             prune command will

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: I think sysutils/rsnapshot does what you want. It uses hard links to simulate snapshots on classic filesystems and manages different ranges of snapshots. You can specify how much snapshots you want to keep for each

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:    hammer cleanup only removes snapshots over X days old.  It can't    distinguish between fine-grained and coarse-grained snapshots    that you explicitly tell hammer to make.  You would have to remove    

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi George, On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:40:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: I think sysutils/rsnapshot does what you want. It uses hard links to simulate snapshots on classic filesystems and manages different ranges

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Francois Tigeot ftig...@wolfpond.org wrote: Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you. I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its snapshot distribution in

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor-flags HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
Hi, I don't think any body needs to waste time looking at my core dump. I had as cron entry #Check and restart mirroring */10 * * * * (cd /root/adm; /usr/bin/lockf -k -t 0 .lockfile ./hms) now hms was initially dfly-bkpsrv# cat /root/adm/hms hammer mirror-stream /Backup1/Data /Backup2/Data

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor-flags HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Sending it to list as per Justin's recommendation : :Hi, : :My DragonFly v2.7.0.54.g0754fe-DEVELOPMENT #18: Wed Apr =A07 10:09:21 :IST 2010 core dumps occassionally. : :I can't update it to the latest version because it core dumps before :make buildworld completes :-) : :Attached output of call

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor-flags HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:    The dumpsys.tgz file does not contain any files, just the var.crash    softlink itself.  I definitely do not want you to post output from    a kernel crash to the list!  That would be too big.  Instead put  

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor-flags HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi, : :I don't think any body needs to waste time looking at my core dump. : :I had as cron entry : :#Check and restart mirroring :*/10 * * * * (cd /root/adm; /usr/bin/lockf -k -t 0 .lockfile ./hms) : :now hms was initially : :dfly-bkpsrv# cat /root/adm/hms :hammer mirror-stream /Backup1/Data

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
: Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you. : : I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than : rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its : snapshot distribution in different intervals for archiving purposes. : This is the one thing rsnapshot

More pkgsrc-2010Q1 build status

2010-04-28 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
2010Q1 is built as binaries for i386/2.6 and x86_64/2.6/2.7. For some reason, I'm having trouble with the build on i386/2.7. http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.7/20100428.0433/meta/report.html I'm cleaning it out and restarting to see if it's a cruft issue. The i386/2.6 binaries