Updating a pkgsrc package

2010-05-02 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi, I have locally updated mail/prayer to version 1.3.2. The pkgsrc package is more than two years old. It now compiles and installs cleanly on DragonFly. Is there any thing I should be aware before submitting my work to the pkgsrc guys ? My main concern is that I do not have any NetBSD machine

Re: Updating a pkgsrc package

2010-05-02 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Sun, May 2, 2010 7:25 am, Francois Tigeot wrote: Hi, I have locally updated mail/prayer to version 1.3.2. The pkgsrc package is more than two years old. It now compiles and installs cleanly on DragonFly. Is there any thing I should be aware before submitting my work to the pkgsrc guys ?

Re: Amount of wiki spam

2010-05-02 Thread Matthias Schmidt
Hi, * Justin C. Sherrill wrote: www.dragonflybsd.org's updated, both in ikiwiki version and the note on the edit page - if the message still isn't dramatic enough, we can make it more noticeable. Thanks for your work! Let's try it with this message and see if its works. If not, we could

Re: Updating a pkgsrc package

2010-05-02 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:09:22AM -0400, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: On Sun, May 2, 2010 7:25 am, Francois Tigeot wrote: I have locally updated mail/prayer to version 1.3.2. Is there any thing I should be aware before submitting my work to the pkgsrc guys ? My main concern is that I do

pkgsrc DragonFly 2.6/i386 2010-04-30 18:41

2010-05-02 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
This is pkgsrc-2010Q1. I'm still waiting on the i386/2.7/2010Q1 build on avalon, which is about 25% done, and then 2010Q1 will become the default for pkg_radd. -- pkgsrc bulk build report DragonFly

first comment line in crontab always gets removed

2010-05-02 Thread Siju George
Hi, I commented out my first line in crontab and saved it. When I took 'crontab -e' I found that it was removed. I tested it again. same behavior The first line ony gets removed if it starts with a # Is this accepted behavior? Thanks --Siju

Re: slave pfs destruction fails initially - pfs-destroy of PFS#1 failed: Directory not empty

2010-05-02 Thread Siju George
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote: :Yes I killed all mirror stream prosessess and cheked with ps auwx : :thanks : :--Siju    It returns that error when it is unable to completely clean out the    B-Tree for the PFS in question.  Normally this

Re: slave pfs destruction fails initially - pfs-destroy of PFS#1 failed: Directory not empty

2010-05-02 Thread Siju George
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote: I found out that it gives the error in my case because there is a / at the end of the pfs when I use tab for auto complete :-) Well I found that is not true. Some times i get the error when there is no trailing / too.

Re: slave pfs destruction fails initially - pfs-destroy of PFS#1 failed: Directory not empty

2010-05-02 Thread Siju George
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Siju George sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote: I found out that it gives the error in my case because there is a / at the end of the pfs when I use tab for auto complete :-) Well I found that