On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:49:11 +0200, Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl
wrote:
[...]
BTW. I looked over packages. It seems to me the applications are not
fresh. Wait a minute - I think that OpenBSD is more up-to-date
concerning the packages.
[...]
We use pkgsrc for packages, so we depend on what
I have some question about directive in dma.conf file:
1) SMARTHOST is my computer that I use to send email with dma?
2) What is meaning of MAILNAME directive?
3) How can I specify mail's message with dma command?
Regards,
savio
--
only the paranoid will survive
* dark0s Optik wrote:
I have some question about directive in dma.conf file:
1) SMARTHOST is my computer that I use to send email with dma?
No, SMARTHOST is the host name of your mail relay, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host
2) What is meaning of MAILNAME directive?
You can use
Setup dma - /etc/mail/mailer.conf and just use your favorite MUA
(mailx, mutt, Thunderbird, ...). Just make sure its configured to send
mails through sendmail and not directly to your smarthost.
That is to say that if I want send mail with dma, then I need sendmail
or postfix?
--
only
* dark0s Optik wrote:
Setup dma - /etc/mail/mailer.conf and just use your favorite MUA
(mailx, mutt, Thunderbird, ...). Just make sure its configured to send
mails through sendmail and not directly to your smarthost.
That is to say that if I want send mail with dma, then I need sendmail
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:21:19 -0600
Samuel J. Greear s...@evilcode.net wrote:
(...)
I will try to answer here and now.
The purpose of my question(s) is because I believe DragonFly BSD is
not adequately represented in the easily accessible (main page and
pages directly linked from it)
I got interested in DragonFly early on because of the stated goals. It was
exciting to see a BSD project that was really trying to advance the kernel.
I started replacing more and more of my machines with DF until I had only
one holdout, an OpenBSD machine for pf, and then that one got replaced
Since the very beginning, the goals are high: async messaging, lwkt, SSI.
Later came HAMMER, dma, vkernels.
Waiting eagerly for recent locking changes to stablize (and to upgrade my
home server)
And, sure, for smooth operation on my 2.4GHz P4 with 512MB RAM (ok, it has
1.5Gig for a month or so)
Moin,
well, I have a lot of reasons:
- At first, I was surprised how easy it was to get patches etc. accepted
in the DragonFly repo
- The vkernel is really useful for giving CS courses at the university.
Its about hacking a real OS kernel and not some kind of OS Java
simulator. And
:That explains the noticable performance difference just logging in... I
:always just thought avalon was getting used for something else I didn't
:know about...
Yah, the bulk build runs Avalon out of memory faster than it can swap
pages out because the bulk build is also loading the disk
Hi.
I don't remember why I ended up using DragonFly, it certainly wasn't
because of fancy project goals and such, but I do remember my venture
into BSD land started on IRC, something like this:
luxh: hi. which is the best distro?
@coolguy: none. all the cool guys use freebsd
luxh: what's that?
Matthias Schmidt wrote:
No, dma replaces sendmail/postfix (in parts). Sending through
sendmail means that your MUA uses the local installed MTA (here dma)
and not a remote smarthost. This is a known phrase.
for reference as in:
# /usr/sbin/sendmail -t EOF
To: u...@host
From: m...@here
12 matches
Mail list logo
