Performance results / VM related SMP locking work - committed (3)

2011-10-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
Another huge performance improvement for many-cores systems. I removed the last bottleneck spinlock in the VM system. This spinlock was only locking the PQ_INACTIVE vm_page_queue for a very short period of time but with 48 cores it was enough to limit the VM fault rate. With the

Re: Performance results / VM related SMP locking work - committed (3)

2011-10-28 Thread Alex Hornung
Great work! Nonetheless I feel that the last few changes nerf a quad-core machine way too much; you are killing 50% of what you gained in the -j48 case for buildkernel and even worse than in the original case with -j4, which is the most common case. buildworld -j8 on test29 also loses 50% of the

Re: Does something like nanobsd.sh exist or in the making for DF?

2011-10-28 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
Pretty much on spot .. yesterday I was on #dragonflybsd asking it there was any interest on working on a DragonFlyBSD version of FreeNAS ... I´ll create a new thread about this as soon as a I can give it a little more thought. But, basically, yes .. FreeNAS is really good .. UFS and ZFS are not ..

FreeNAS Port? (Was: Re: Does something like nanobsd.sh exist or in the making for DF?)

2011-10-28 Thread Samuel J. Greear
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Gonzalo Nemmi gne...@gmail.com wrote: Pretty much on spot .. yesterday I was on #dragonflybsd asking it there was any interest on working on a DragonFlyBSD version of FreeNAS ... The first thing someone would want to do is fully implement and get working well