On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 12:56 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:36:39PM +0200, Grzegorz B?ach wrote:
When I try install pkg from vulnerable dir and its depends are it All
dir, dependences can't be installed, but when I try install pkg where
pkg and every depends are
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 12:48 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
Hi all,
due to the dead of my old server I've moved the pkgsrc build system to
colocation. A few other things apply as well, so the following changes
should be of general interest:
(1) Binary packages for pkgsrc-current are
Dnia 17-03-2007, So o godzinie 00:05 +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert
napisał(a):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c) add support for openwall tcb - the alternative to shadow (with pam
module) which is more secure than pam_unix and pam_pwdb, because tools
like 'passwd' or 'chage' don't neet SUID,
Dnia 16-03-2007, Pt o godzinie 18:58 -0700, Matthew Dillon napisał(a):
Well, hmm. Kinda out of the blue, and I don't want to discourage anyone
who is this enthusiastic, but I have a few buts of my own.
1.
a) chg default password_format do blowfish since there are known
algoritm
Dnia 16-03-2007, Pt o godzinie 17:45 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger
napisał(a):
c) add support for openwall tcb - the alternative to shadow (with pam
module) which is more secure than pam_unix and pam_pwdb, because tools
like 'passwd' or 'chage' don't neet SUID, instead it use SGID 'shadow'.
Dnia 16-03-2007, Pt o godzinie 17:57 +0100, Gergo Szakal napisał(a):
*My* *sole* opinion follows:
* pkgsrc is here to stay, it works fine, you'd better contribute to (even
smoother) pkgsrc integration
* postfix license is too restrictive (IBM), same for stunnel (GPL),
developers of *BSD
