Re: [PATCH] tmpfs work update (was tmpfs initial work)

2010-01-19 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hello Matt and df users again, : : :Here is an update of my tmpfs porting. The filesystem is getting much :more robust than initial post, :but still I see same memory corruption issue. : :Yet I feel it is a worth to share this update with community to catch :up recent vm_pager_getpage() /

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs work update (was tmpfs initial work)

2010-01-19 Thread Naoya Sugioka
Hi Matt, Thank you for the precise response. It is a same strategy of previous porter. I thought it is a way to remove a dirty hack (vm object and anonymous object shares rb_memq) I'll play around implementing a buffer cache (or maybe, a page cache)...it is a most interesting part of this poring.

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs work update (was tmpfs initial work)

2010-01-19 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi Matt, : :Thank you for the precise response. It is a same strategy of previous porter. :I thought it is a way to remove a dirty hack (vm object and anonymous :object shares rb_memq) :I'll play around implementing a buffer cache (or maybe, a page :cache)...it is a most interesting :part of