Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
I told that the drives were da4/6, I was wrong, drives ARE ad4/6.
[..]
Sorry for bothering you all with nothing :-(
happens to me all the time in linux with hda and sda when I instead write ad or
da :)
cheers
simon
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert
Hi!
I have used Linux. I managed to install 1.8.x to my system (in one
drive) and it boot as I expected. I headed to make my hard drive
mirrored, but both fdisk and disklabel said that both drives were not
configured. :-O
Tero Mäntyvaara
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Hi!
I have used Linux. I managed to install 1.8.x to my system (in one
drive) and it boot as I expected. I headed to make my hard drive
mirrored,
'Mirrored' by which means, of the several available?
i.e. - are you on 'raw' ata / nata, 'psuedo-RAID' ata controller,
Sorry that I was unpunctual with the details.
After reading Bill's reply I noticed that my signature was also
missing, with important hardware information... :-/
Bill Hacker wrote:
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
Hi!
I have used Linux. I managed to install 1.8.x to my system (in one
drive) and it
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
..
fdisk -BI da6 (system disk is da4)
but then I get that message that drive is not configured. :-/
I get same result if I use disklabel to dedicate drive
Random ideas: do you actually have a /dev/da6? Does dmesg
show a da6 during boot?
I have no experience
walt wrote:
Tero Mäntyvaara wrote:
...
fdisk -BI da6 (system disk is da4)
but then I get that message that drive is not configured. :-/
I get same result if I use disklabel to dedicate drive
Random ideas: do you actually have a /dev/da6? Does dmesg
show a da6 during boot?
Yes,
