Matthew Dillon wrote:
:But - at the end of the day - how much [extra?] on-disk space will be
:needed to insure mount 'as-of' is 'good enough' for some realisitic span
:(a week?, a month?)? 'Forever' may be too much to ask.
The amount of disk needed is precisely the same as the amount of
:But - at the end of the day - how much [extra?] on-disk space will be
:needed to insure mount 'as-of' is 'good enough' for some realisitic span
:(a week?, a month?)? 'Forever' may be too much to ask.
The amount of disk needed is precisely the same as the amount of
historical data
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:But - at the end of the day - how much [extra?] on-disk space will be
:needed to insure mount 'as-of' is 'good enough' for some realisitic span
:(a week?, a month?)? 'Forever' may be too much to ask.
The amount of disk needed is precisely the same as the amount of
Bill Hacker wrote:
Michael Neumann wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this,
but it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so...
Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
mine about HammerFS features (and
: So it comes down to how much space you are willing to eat up to store
: the history, and what kind of granularity you will want for the history.
:
:OK - so it WILL be a 'tunable', then.
:...
:HAMMER cannot protect against all forms of human error - BUT - if it
:inherently rebuilds more
Bill Hacker wrote:
I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this, but
it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so...
Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it with ZFS):
:Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
:mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it with ZFS):
:
:http://www.ntecs.de/blog/articles/2008/01/17/zfs-vs-hammerfs
:
:I can't await to try it out in real!
:
:Regards,
:
: Michael
Nice. There are a
Michael Neumann wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this,
but it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so...
Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Sorry to hijack this thread.
Not to worry!
It was *intended* to be 'hijacked'. Welcome!
Just wanna mention a little write down of
:mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it with ZFS):
:
:http://www.ntecs.de/blog/articles/2008/01/17/zfs-vs-hammerfs
:
I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this, but
it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so...
.. to the extent networked clustering AND inherent recoverablility are
intended to be major strengths - to what comparable fs should we expect
to look if we were to
10 matches
Mail list logo
