Hello!
I think E17 + Firefox is a good solution.
It's fast, looks good and it's unique
and pkgsrc/wip/e17 works fine on my DragonFly machine
-- ThEgRaZe
Louisa Luciani wrote:
The GSoC is now upon us and so it is time to hear what you guys would
like to see on the new and improved:
DragonFly The X Edition Live-CD
;)
Since I do not want to start an unmanageable discussion, I'd like to
receive your replies privately so that I can return with
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:34:11PM +0200, Louisa Luciani wrote:
Perhaps we can begin by discussing the desktop environment/window
manager (Everyone who has emailed me so far has a different opinion on
this). e.g. What are your experiences? Do we want more qt or gtk programs?
I think using
I think using qt/kde would be easier. As the size does not count to much
on a DVD using 100+ gnome apps would be a bit harder. So I would start
with KDE if I were you.
xfce4 is also a good one imo and should be also faster than kde, but
i've never tried kde4.
And the most important is
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Robert Luciani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think using qt/kde would be easier. As the size does not count to much
on a DVD using 100+ gnome apps would be a bit harder. So I would start
with KDE if I were you.
xfce4 is also a good one imo and should be also
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:13:11PM +0200, Robert Luciani wrote:
I think using Gnome would be better than KDE.
Firstly, all popular apps use gtk+ like: Firefox, Thunderbird,
OpenOffice, Pidgin, Xchat, Wireshark, gvim, Ekiga, F-Spot, Gimp, and
much more.
Well, these depends on gtk+2, not
On Mon, June 2, 2008 6:34 am, Louisa Luciani wrote:
Perhaps we can begin by discussing the desktop environment/window
manager (Everyone who has emailed me so far has a different opinion on
this). e.g. What are your experiences? Do we want more qt or gtk programs?
I don't want to drown the
:I don't want to drown the user in choices; the whole reason for a Live
:disk like this is to let the user get started doing stuff, and not have to
:take time picking window managers and other programs.
:
:Any window manger will work, as long as it remains the same. Knowing what
:the interface
I think guys, we should use KDE 4.x for the GUI on the livecd.
Petr
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:45:31 am VOROSKOI Andras wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:13:11PM +0200, Robert Luciani wrote:
I think using Gnome would be better than KDE.
Firstly, all popular apps use gtk+ like: Firefox,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Petr Janda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think guys, we should use KDE 4.x for the GUI on the livecd.
Petr
+1 for KDE 4.x
K.
Karthik Subramanian wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Petr Janda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think guys, we should use KDE 4.x for the GUI on the livecd.
Petr
+1 for KDE 4.x
KDE committer hat on
Wow! I see a lot of resources coming to make KDE 4 work on DragonFly ...
FYI, even Qt
Jost Tobias Springenberg wrote:
Another feature that might be worth thinking of is the possibility to easily
re-spin the dvd.
Such that you can download it use it, if you like you can install it and
after you have used it for some time you might think of applications that you
need which are
What's the purpose of this LiveCD? Who's it targeting?
Seems like a bit of a shotgun approach for everyone to submit what
they want on it. It's much easier to determine what should be on it
when it's got some very clear goals.
I tend to use LiveCDs for:
- fixing problems (though I use
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:The GSoC is now upon us and so it is time to hear what you guys would
:like to see on the new and improved:
:DragonFly The X Edition Live-CD
Is it going to be a CD or a DVD ? That's an important distinction.
Personally I think a special-edition Live-CD is
Oliver Fromme wrote:
On the other hand, there are still some machines that
only have CD-ROM drives (not DVD). Maybe those could be
supported with a stripped-down version of the DVD, e.g.
by omitting some cool-but-not-important stuff (some script
could generate this automatically).
In the
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
On the other hand, there are still some machines that
only have CD-ROM drives (not DVD). Maybe those could be
supported with a stripped-down version of the DVD, e.g.
by omitting some cool-but-not-important stuff (some script
could
: Perhaps we could have the liveDVD as the default platform then and
: use techniques (compression/omission) to make liveCDs compatible?
:
:Yes, that's exactly what I meant to say.
:
:Best regards
: Oliver
:
:--
:Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
The GSoC is now upon us and so it is time to hear what you guys would
like to see on the new and improved:
DragonFly The X Edition Live-CD
;)
Since I do not want to start an unmanageable discussion, I'd like to
receive your replies privately so that I can return with the compiled
results, and the
:The GSoC is now upon us and so it is time to hear what you guys would
:like to see on the new and improved:
:DragonFly The X Edition Live-CD
:;)
:Louisa Luciani
:www.lolaluci.se/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Is it going to be a CD or a DVD ? That's an important distinction.
Personally I think a
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:The GSoC is now upon us and so it is time to hear what you guys would
:like to see on the new and improved:
:DragonFly The X Edition Live-CD
:;)
:Louisa Luciani
:www.lolaluci.se/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Is it going to be a CD or a DVD ? That's an important
20 matches
Mail list logo
