On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> Have there been any measurements as to performance penalties with
> 'options SMP' on uniprocessor systems?
>
> -- vs
>
Not AFAIK, but quantifying the damage should be a definite
prerequisite before eliminating the SMP option altogether
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> Have there been any measurements as to performance penalties with
> 'options SMP' on uniprocessor systems?
It's just to ease our iso image generation.
My plan is to enable LAPIC and I/O APIC in UP kernel; UP boxes boot w/
SMP kernel (t
Have there been any measurements as to performance penalties with
'options SMP' on uniprocessor systems?
-- vs
Dear Userbase,
thanks to sephe's great work in the recent weeks, SMP kernels should boot
and work on UP boxes.
So I've added 'options SMP' to our default GENERIC and X86_64_GENERIC
kernel configs.
There are people who are using the vanilla GENERIC or X86_64_GENERIC
config from /usr/src/
