On 2006-07-05 22:23, Jose timofonic wrote:
Hello,
by osnews (http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=15096)
I discovered an article about the Linux scheduler and
oriented on the new stuff for the 2.6 tree. Here you
has the link:
That Linux is replacing its scheduler, threading facilities, VM,
Filesystem of Choice, etc. several times per branch, often at a cost
to module compatibility, is a pretty clear reason to use it as a
counter-example of kernel development. I don't even suppose Linux is a
competitor - DragonFly is
