Re: Need Reassurance for using DragonFly for Prodduction

2007-04-08 Thread Bill Hacker
Siju George wrote: *snip* Does it run quite Well on Intel's Core2Duo 1.8 Runs fine here on Core-D, both dual single core, 2.8 3.0 GHz, tested with 1 GB SDRAM, DDR 266, 2 GB DDR2 @ 800 MHz fsb. Tyan, Asus, MSi, et al. Should be no problem on Core-2 Duo 1024 MHz fsb with commodity

Re: Need Reassurance for using DragonFly for Prodduction

2007-04-08 Thread Siju George
On 4/8/07, Bill Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George wrote: *snip* Does it run quite Well on Intel's Core2Duo 1.8 Runs fine here on Core-D, both dual single core, 2.8 3.0 GHz, tested with 1 GB SDRAM, DDR 266, 2 GB DDR2 @ 800 MHz fsb. Tyan, Asus, MSi, et al. Should be no problem on

Need Reassurance for using DragonFly for Prodduction

2007-04-07 Thread Siju George
Hi, I am Planning to migrate my Samba Domain Controller from FreeBSd 6.2 to NetBSD 3.1. Now I am having thoughts about using DragonFly 1.4 as it is Stable. Just Wondering For what all Production purposes people are using DragonFly out there :-) Any Body using it as a Samba Domain Controller?

Re: Need Reassurance for using DragonFly for Prodduction

2007-04-07 Thread Sascha Wildner
Gergo Szakal wrote: On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 00:54:33 +0530 Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am Planning to migrate my Samba Domain Controller from FreeBSd 6.2 to NetBSD 3.1. Now I am having thoughts about using DragonFly 1.4 as it is Stable. Use 1.8.0 as that is the latest stable

Re: Need Reassurance for using DragonFly for Prodduction

2007-04-07 Thread Gergo Szakal
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 00:54:33 +0530 Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am Planning to migrate my Samba Domain Controller from FreeBSd 6.2 to NetBSD 3.1. Now I am having thoughts about using DragonFly 1.4 as it is Stable. Use 1.8.0 as that is the latest stable release. Just