Sorry.
That was supposed to go to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Crosswell
Date: 18 May 2011 23:40
Subject: Re: Nics.
To: Justin Sherrill
On 18 May 2011 12:47, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, David Crosswell
> wrote:
&
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, David Crosswell
wrote:
> Has anybody got any advice on what nics work best with Dragonfly, other than
> the ones on-site?
I've had good luck with Intel chipsets, like those supported by the
fxp or em drivers.
If you want a list of everything, you
Hello,
I've checked out the site and handbook, but I thought I would ask here also
in case of recent revelations.
Has anybody got any advice on what nics work best with Dragonfly, other than
the ones on-site?
Thanks for any time and trouble.
Regards,
David Crosswell.
--
In a world without
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Eugene wrote:
> Hello.
> Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I plan to drop
>>
>> Following NIC drivers' ISA part:
>> an, ar, cs, ed, ep, ex, fe, sn
>>
> How is to tell that I still sometime
Hello.
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
Hi all,
I plan to drop
Following NIC drivers' ISA part:
an, ar, cs, ed, ep, ex, fe, sn
How is to tell that I still sometimes use ed NICs (RTL8029)
:(
Is leaving this drivers would couse many problems?
Following NIC drivers' EISA part:
ep, vx
Fol
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
>
> :
> :Sascha Wildner schrieb:
> :> Hey cool idea. Generally my plan was to wait until after 2.2 and then
> :> drop support for all ISA drivers that need a physical ISA card and all
> :> EISA drivers. Making 2.0 the last release to support IS
:
:Sascha Wildner schrieb:
:> Hey cool idea. Generally my plan was to wait until after 2.2 and then
:> drop support for all ISA drivers that need a physical ISA card and all
:> EISA drivers. Making 2.0 the last release to support ISA.
:
:Making 2.2 the last release to support ISA I meant.
:
:Sas
Matthias Schmidt schrieb:
Following NIC drivers' ISA part:
an, ar, cs, ed, ep, ex, fe, sn
Not sure about ed(4). This driver is often used in virtualization
software. At least it was used in qemu some time ago, but I'm not sure
if its still used today. Can somebody comment on that?
It's use
Hi,
* Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I plan to drop
>
> Following NIC drivers' ISA part:
> an, ar, cs, ed, ep, ex, fe, sn
Not sure about ed(4). This driver is often used in virtualization
software. At least it was used in qemu some time ago, but I'm not sure
if its still used today. C
Sascha Wildner schrieb:
Hey cool idea. Generally my plan was to wait until after 2.2 and then
drop support for all ISA drivers that need a physical ISA card and all
EISA drivers. Making 2.0 the last release to support ISA.
Making 2.2 the last release to support ISA I meant.
Sascha
--
http://
Sepherosa Ziehau schrieb:
Hi all,
I plan to drop
Following NIC drivers' ISA part:
an, ar, cs, ed, ep, ex, fe, sn
Following NIC drivers' EISA part:
ep, vx
Following NIC drivers will be complete dropped (ISA only):
el, ie, le, rdp, wl
If no objection comes within next three days, I will start
Hi all,
I plan to drop
Following NIC drivers' ISA part:
an, ar, cs, ed, ep, ex, fe, sn
Following NIC drivers' EISA part:
ep, vx
Following NIC drivers will be complete dropped (ISA only):
el, ie, le, rdp, wl
If no objection comes within next three days, I will start the dropping.
Best Regards,
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, March 15, 2007 9:14 pm, Petr Janda wrote:
Im using PowerDN (authoritative)S and PowerDNS-Recursor (nscache). They
need to run sepately. Have you used the ldap module for bind? Besides
last release being 2 years ago, i heard that its utterly useless too.
(you
On Thu, March 15, 2007 9:14 pm, Petr Janda wrote:
> Im using PowerDN (authoritative)S and PowerDNS-Recursor (nscache). They
> need to run sepately. Have you used the ldap module for bind? Besides
> last release being 2 years ago, i heard that its utterly useless too.
> (you gotta keep the zone fil
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, March 15, 2007 7:58 pm, Petr Janda wrote:
Using Bind is out of question. The zones are stored in LDAP.
There's a number of free LDAP and DNS products out there; I was looking at
them as part of a work project.
http://ldapdns.sourceforge.net/
http://n
On Thu, March 15, 2007 7:58 pm, Petr Janda wrote:
> Using Bind is out of question. The zones are stored in LDAP.
There's a number of free LDAP and DNS products out there; I was looking at
them as part of a work project.
http://ldapdns.sourceforge.net/
http://nimh.org/code/ldapdns/
http://www.ven
Mire, John wrote:
Why don't you just use 2 different views under bind this is trivial, and should
do exactly what you want with one ip address.
Using Bind is out of question. The zones are stored in LDAP.
Petr
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Petr Janda
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:10 AM
To: users@crater.dragonflybsd.org
Subject: 2 NICs and 1 network
Hi there,
Im trying to run an authoritative dns server on 1 NIC and dns
cache/recursive resolver on another NIC. Therefore 2 IPs on the s
Hi there,
Im trying to run an authoritative dns server on 1 NIC and dns
cache/recursive resolver on another NIC. Therefore 2 IPs on the same net
and connected to the same switch. Therefore theres a problem. What
options do i have in regards to resolving the issue without putting them
on differ
>Matt Dillon wrote:
>:I installed DFly 1.4.4 today and it proply panic'd with a problem in
>:tulip_rx_intr(), as described in this mail thread:
>:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/bugs/2006-02/msg00010.html
> Try burning a recent build of HEAD. There's a good chance that the
> particular
Matt Emmerton wrote:
I installed DFly 1.4.4 today and it proply panic'd with a problem in
tulip_rx_intr(), as described in this mail thread:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/bugs/2006-02/msg00010.html
I was dismayed to find that the DFly ISOs don't include sources, so I can't
patch this
On 7/7/06, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:I installed DFly 1.4.4 today and it proply panic'd with a problem in
:tulip_rx_intr(), as described in this mail thread:
:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/bugs/2006-02/msg00010.html
:
:I was dismayed to find that the DFly ISOs don't i
:I installed DFly 1.4.4 today and it proply panic'd with a problem in
:tulip_rx_intr(), as described in this mail thread:
:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/bugs/2006-02/msg00010.html
:
:I was dismayed to find that the DFly ISOs don't include sources, so I can't
:patch this system and get i
I installed DFly 1.4.4 today and it proply panic'd with a problem in
tulip_rx_intr(), as described in this mail thread:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/bugs/2006-02/msg00010.html
I was dismayed to find that the DFly ISOs don't include sources, so I can't
patch this system and get it on th
24 matches
Mail list logo
