Re: PKGSRC will be officially supported as of the next release

2005-09-01 Thread Marcin Jessa
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:21:33 +0200 Martin P. Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Dillon wrote: cut This is proven out by the number of commits to dfports recently (just 2 files in the last 60 days, and 18 in the last 90). dfports has clearly outlived its usefulness. cut

Re: PKGSRC will be officially supported as of the next release

2005-09-01 Thread Max Okumoto
Matthew Dillon wrote: I've been watching PKGSRC developments with some eagerness, in particular the increasing numbers of DragonFly developers willing to put significant time into making PKGSRC work for DragonFly, not to mention the large number of people (judging from the

Re: PKGSRC will be officially supported as of the next release

2005-09-01 Thread walt
Max Okumoto wrote: Hmmm... so I guess I had better figure out the features that are missing in our version of make to match the netbsd make. :-) That would be wonderful -- I can't remember to type bmake instead of make. Keep in mind that bmake has a bug:

Re: PKGSRC will be officially supported as of the next release

2005-09-01 Thread Max Okumoto
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:21:33AM +0200, Martin P. Hellwig wrote: I heartly agree, but I wonder how much it will be the official port infrastructure, for example (no intend to bikeshed coloring, as long as its green) I being a long and hardish FreeBSD user found