On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:44:54 +0200
Simon Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06.09.2005, at 00:37, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:In fact, it seems people prefer NetBSD's ftpd, which appears to be
:based on lukemftpd. So why not kill off our ftpd and settle on
:moving lukemftpd into our
On 2005-09-06, Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found the ftpd in FreeBSD to be powerful enough for most things. If
you need encrypted transmissions, chances are you should be using SFTP
in first place (as anon FTP over SSL doesn't make much sense in my book
OTOTH, having the
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:37:36PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:In fact, it seems people prefer NetBSD's ftpd, which appears to be
:based on lukemftpd. So why not kill off our ftpd and settle on
:moving lukemftpd into our libexec/ftpd, a-la NetBSD?
:--
:Carl Schmidt
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]