Re: Purpose of lukemftpd?

2005-09-06 Thread Marcin Jessa
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:44:54 +0200 Simon Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06.09.2005, at 00:37, Matthew Dillon wrote: :In fact, it seems people prefer NetBSD's ftpd, which appears to be :based on lukemftpd. So why not kill off our ftpd and settle on :moving lukemftpd into our

Re: Purpose of lukemftpd?

2005-09-06 Thread Yiorgos Adamopoulos
On 2005-09-06, Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've found the ftpd in FreeBSD to be powerful enough for most things. If you need encrypted transmissions, chances are you should be using SFTP in first place (as anon FTP over SSL doesn't make much sense in my book OTOTH, having the

Re: Purpose of lukemftpd?

2005-09-05 Thread Carl A. Schmidt
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:37:36PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: :In fact, it seems people prefer NetBSD's ftpd, which appears to be :based on lukemftpd. So why not kill off our ftpd and settle on :moving lukemftpd into our libexec/ftpd, a-la NetBSD? :-- :Carl Schmidt :[EMAIL PROTECTED]