On 2006-01-12, Erik Wikström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say that if there is a move then it will be to a decentralized VCS
and with some luck it will include an efficient checkout in the package.
Hm, I went for Mercurial and I'll never look back (the same regards to
the Linux kernel tree on
On 2006-01-12 14:29, Erik Wikström wrote:
On 2006-01-12 05:43, Nigel Weeks wrote:
A week or so ago, a discussion rattled around about cvsup being written in
c++.
What about launching into it, and moving to subversion instead? That way,
the updater could be included in the base system, as it's
At 3:43 PM +1100 1/12/06, Nigel Weeks wrote:
A week or so ago, a discussion rattled around about cvsup
being written in c++.
Some comments on this part of your message: FreeBSD already has
a side project to rewrite cvsup in C (plain C, not C++). Right
now this is not a full featured
Csaba Henk wrote:
So I'd appreciate if you could dig up the exact link, but if you
can't... this very thread made me aware of the fact that with cvsup I
can get the revision history (RCS files), so there is nothing to keep me
away from setting up a hg mirror for FBSD like you do for Dfly apart
A week or so ago, a discussion rattled around about cvsup being written in
c++.
What about launching into it, and moving to subversion instead? That way,
the updater could be included in the base system, as it's c++ AND BSD
licenced.
Probably great scads or work, but it might be a good idea.
N.
