Chris Csanady wrote:
I've watched ReiserFS crash and burn in horribly bad ways that the
resulting fsck upon reboot took a long weekend to complete.
Was this on an ATA disc by chance? I imagine that this sort of file
system would be extremely fragile with write caching. That aside, I
don't
walt wrote:
Are you counting a crash as a form of 'reboot'? I can certainly
understand why a busy kernel developer might want to speed up
something he does many time a day -- but most sysadmins probably
never want to reboot...
Heh... a crash is not only a form but probably the form of reboot
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
As far as recovery after a crash is involved, clearly nothing beats
journalling, and i have to say that performancewise, i have the
impression that Linux journalled filesystems do *very* well
compared to FreeBSD, or at least
joerg wrote @ Sat, 3 Sep 2005 14:09:39 +0200:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
As far as recovery after a crash is involved, clearly nothing beats
journalling, and i have to say that performancewise, i have the
impression that Linux journalled filesystems do
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:13:52PM -, Andreas Hauser wrote:
joerg wrote @ Sat, 3 Sep 2005 14:09:39 +0200:
Don't compare experimental filesystems with UFS :-)
While not having as much testing behind them as UFS, at least on Linux,
they aren't experimental filesystems anymore.
I was
:While not having as much testing behind them as UFS, at least on Linux,
:they aren't experimental filesystems anymore.
:
: But seriously, the
: structure of JFS and XFS is very different from UFS, e.g. the use of
: btrees for almost anything. That makes them more suitable for some
: operations,
Matthew Dillon wrote:
A friend of mine swears by linux, but curses just about every filesystem
he tries (and curses UFS as well).
I'll have my wife call his wife -- they'll modify that behavior quickly!
There are two things I want for UFS: (1) Nearly instant reboots
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
As far as recovery after a crash is involved, clearly nothing beats
journalling, and i have to say that performancewise, i have the
impression that Linux journalled filesystems do *very* well
compared to
For reference, I'm using:
# uname -sv
DragonFly DragonFly 1.3-Preview #0: Fri Jul 8 14:09:49 CEST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
I have created a vinum partition that is 1.12 terabytes. As some of
you may expect, /sbin/newfs is not happy with this size (# sectors in
Dave Hayes wrote:
For reference, I'm using:
# uname -sv
DragonFly DragonFly 1.3-Preview #0: Fri Jul 8 14:09:49 CEST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
I have created a vinum partition that is 1.12 terabytes. As some of
you may expect, /sbin/newfs is not happy with this
10 matches
Mail list logo
