[no offence, not directed particularly at you, just taking this mail to hang
the rant]
Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
Now it just occurred to me we can have ZFS for the nominal price of
supporting FUSE. It's not as fast as a pure kernel version, of course,
but Matt says he wants userland file systems
On 2/20/07, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the choice is:
1. port FUSE as a new filesystem
2. port ZFS as a new filesystem
notice that only the name differs? It is both work, so why not go for the real
thing? FUSE does not have a particularly optimized interface, so
I got to thinking, there is a lot of debate raging over whether ZFS or
DFS (my tentative nickname for the alternative) is a better priority
for development. I was previously on the ZFS camp, thinking a good
on-disk file system which is gaining a lot of hype and adoption would
be a very good
