Update:
After additional consideration and some discussion on the Dragonfly IRC,
etc, we have decided to go ahead and put this project on the back
burner for now. For one, it may be a while before we can get around to
adding disklabel64 support. Also, the Dragonfly community seems to
Jost Tobias Springenberg schrieb:
Offtopic:
BTW, is the IRC channel listed anywhere on the page or in any ailing list
message ?
I did not know that it existed.
Yeah,
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/mailinglists/
Sascha
--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx
On Tue, March 10, 2009 12:17 pm, Jost Tobias Springenberg wrote:
BTW, is the IRC channel listed anywhere on the page or in any ailing list
message ?
I did not know that it existed.
It's mentioned now on the mailing lists page on the dragonflybsd.org
website. I added it last week, which is
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:54:40PM +, Jost Tobias Springenberg wrote:
Is there any chance of this moving forward ?
As mentioned in my previous post I really need this feature :). If you
need any help or the like I would be more than happy to help and get
this project on track again!
Ok, time for me to reply again :).
I started developing on this, as I mentioned in the first post.
I have a first working interface draft and started to work on the real fdisk
implementation
by moving in core code from the dfly fdisk implementation I stopped development
however when I read
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:38:45PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I could put up a binary if anybody wants to play with it. If you guys
:are interested in taking it over, making it an official part of
:Dragonfly, and updating it for the new disk labels, etc, we were
:considering going ahead
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 04:12:45AM +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Vincent Stemen wrote:
If you like what you see and want to include the tools, Chet said he
will look into adding disklabel64 support. Also, I will go ahead and
work on the planned command line changes I mentioned first
:I could put up a binary if anybody wants to play with it. If you guys
:are interested in taking it over, making it an official part of
:Dragonfly, and updating it for the new disk labels, etc, we were
:considering going ahead and releasing the source. If not, we will
:probably hold off and
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:49:21AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
A few possible gotchas regarding fdisk and disklabels. DragonFly has
a 64 bit disklabel feature now (disklabel64), as well as gpt support,
but lacks boot support for either.
I think the fdisk utility needs to be
A few possible gotchas regarding fdisk and disklabels. DragonFly has
a 64 bit disklabel feature now (disklabel64), as well as gpt support,
but lacks boot support for either.
I think the fdisk utility needs to be separate from the disklabel
utility.
Also as HAMMER moves
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:49 -0700
Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:just a quick sidenote... while I decided to finally play around with hammer
:I had to fiddle around with dragonfly's fdisk implementation and I
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Jost Tobias Springenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:49 -0700
Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Matthew Dillon
We could probably use a new fdisk, I think this would be a good
project.
You may
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Jost Tobias Springenberg
Sorry, couldn't tell you about that. I'm just a user of sfdisk, don't
know anything about its internals.
Apparently it doesn't depend on much:
niobe% ldd /usr/local/sbin/sfdisk
/usr/local/sbin/sfdisk:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:just a quick sidenote... while I decided to finally play around with hammer
:I had to fiddle around with dragonfly's fdisk implementation and I think it
is a mess!
:The menu driven mode is horrible, and absolutely
Hi all,
just a quick sidenote... while I decided to finally play around with hammer
I had to fiddle around with dragonfly's fdisk implementation and I think it is
a mess!
The menu driven mode is horrible, and absolutely not self explaining.
We should definitely adapt the OpenBSD or newer FreeBSD
:Hi all,
:just a quick sidenote... while I decided to finally play around with hammer
:I had to fiddle around with dragonfly's fdisk implementation and I think it is
a mess!
:The menu driven mode is horrible, and absolutely not self explaining.
:We should definitely adapt the OpenBSD or newer
16 matches
Mail list logo
