Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-17 Thread Bill Hacker
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:14:16 +0800 Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org wrote: All-numeral dating might be more human-language independent, and an input-format reminder built-in, as in: --startDDMM=20092008 --endDDMM=01012009 For all numeric it's

Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-16 Thread Jost Tobias Springenberg
Hi again, after some hours of sleep I took a look into the hammer sources and pushed my code in there. If anybody else cares about this option, the patch is attached to this mail. You can then basically use: hammer history-count fname to only display a count (I did not care about any

Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-16 Thread Bill Hacker
Matthew Dillon wrote: :Hi again, *trimmed* If you wanted to get really fancy you could also implement date ranges. hammer --start-date=20-Sep-2008 --end-date=01-Jan-2009 ... -Matt Yes, PLEASE! More work - one time. But bound to

Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-16 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:14:16 +0800 Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org wrote: All-numeral dating might be more human-language independent, and an input-format reminder built-in, as in: --startDDMM=20092008 --endDDMM=01012009 For all numeric it's probably best to use ISO8601