On Thu, 21 May 2009, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
>
> I'm working my job and that of several laid-off coworkers right now, and
> looking for a new job, so I've been slow - I'm even falling behind on the
> Digest. Quick, someone employ me!
>
Justin, does this link help in any way ?
http://www.lin
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 03:57:09AM +, Saifi Khan wrote:
> i could checkout the WIP (work in progress), but on attempting
> to build the /usr/pkgsrc/pkgin i get the following error:
wip checkout without main tree?
Joerg
On Wed, May 20, 2009 9:31 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Yes, that's the plan. We aren't going to do anything drastic on
> Avalon until Robin's crypto cycle test finishes (The test takes 2
> cpu-weeks to run). Peter is out of the country as well. I'm not
> sure what Justin's schedul
Hi Saifi,
I think you should checkout first pkgsrc before trying to use pkgsrc
WIP. Sorry for not mentioning this before. So I'd go with the
following:
(If you have something important under /usr/pkgsrc, save it before)
# rm -fr /usr/pkgsrc
# cd /usr
# make pkgsrc-checkout
# make pkgsrc-wip-check
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Not all of our mirrors have all of our top-level softlinks.
> > corecode? Chlamydia is missing a bunch of softlinks.
> >
> > Nearly all the softlinks point to the 2008Q4 package set.
>
> I'll add the l
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Not all of our mirrors have all of our top-level softlinks.
> corecode? Chlamydia is missing a bunch of softlinks.
>
> Nearly all the softlinks point to the 2008Q4 package set.
>
> --
>
> The issue with 2.3.x (head development) v
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > However, i noted that '/usr/share/mk' diretory has the required
> > .mk files.
> >
> > My question is - what is the correct way to install the mk
> > scripts ? Can i just copy the mk/ directory to /usr/pkgsrc/
> > directory ?
>
> No.
>
> You have a
:
:Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> Not all of our mirrors have all of our top-level softlinks.
:> corecode? Chlamydia is missing a bunch of softlinks.
:>=20
:> Nearly all the softlinks point to the 2008Q4 package set.
:
:I'll add the links. We really need to get pkgbox going so that chlamyd
Matthew Dillon wrote:
Not all of our mirrors have all of our top-level softlinks.
corecode? Chlamydia is missing a bunch of softlinks.
Nearly all the softlinks point to the 2008Q4 package set.
I'll add the links. We really need to get pkgbox going so that chlamydia
can mirror of
Not all of our mirrors have all of our top-level softlinks.
corecode? Chlamydia is missing a bunch of softlinks.
Nearly all the softlinks point to the 2008Q4 package set.
--
The issue with 2.3.x (head development) verses 2.2.x (release)
is mainly the fact that libc's ver
> However, i noted that '/usr/share/mk' diretory has the required
> .mk files.
>
> My question is - what is the correct way to install the mk
> scripts ? Can i just copy the mk/ directory to /usr/pkgsrc/
> directory ?
No.
You have a broken or incomplete pkgsrc installation if you don't have
pkgs
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > amd64# make
>
> Please try "bmake"
>
the same error is seen.
amd64# o
/usr/pkgsrc/wip/pkgin
amd64# bmake
bmake: "/usr/pkgsrc/wip/pkgin/Makefile" line 32: Could not find
../../mk/bsd.prefs.mk
bmake: "/usr/pkgsrc/wip/pkgin/Makefile" line 36: Malform
> amd64# make
Please try "bmake"
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Antonio Huete Jimenez wrote:
> Hi Saifi,
> It is pointing to 2.2.1 because you are using 2.2.1. You should use the
> packages compiled for the release you are using.
>
> You might want to give it a try to pkgin. You can find some instructions for
> setting it up here:
> http:
it up here:
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2009-05/msg00064.html
>
> Regards,
> Antonio
> > Hi all:
> >
> > pkg_radd PKG_PATH by default tries to look for
> > http://pkgbox.dragonflybsd.org/DragonFly-2.2.1/All
> >
&g
.html
Regards,
Antonio
Hi all:
pkg_radd PKG_PATH by default tries to look for
http://pkgbox.dragonflybsd.org/DragonFly-2.2.1/All
Which is the recommended PKG_PATH URL to use?
http://mirror.evilprojects.net/pub/DragonFlyBSD/packages/DragonFly-2.2.0/
or
http://mirror.evilprojects.net/pub
Hi all:
pkg_radd PKG_PATH by default tries to look for
http://pkgbox.dragonflybsd.org/DragonFly-2.2.1/All
Which is the recommended PKG_PATH URL to use?
http://mirror.evilprojects.net/pub/DragonFlyBSD/packages/DragonFly-2.2.0/
or
http://mirror.evilprojects.net/pub/DragonFlyBSD/packages/DragonFly
17 matches
Mail list logo