Re: pkg_rolling-replace better with options s or u first

2012-06-07 Thread Siju George
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Edward M martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, This is the second system I had to pkg_rolling-replace and I think Iḿ getting the hang of it by what to do when it errors:-) it is also good to do a #pkgin update pkgin full-upgrade #pkg_rolling-replace -F

Re: pkg_rolling-replace better with options s or u first

2012-06-07 Thread Edward M
On 06/07/2012 04:53 AM, Siju George wrote: it is also good to do a #pkgin update pkgin full-upgrade #pkg_rolling-replace -F before a #pkg_rolling-replace -rsuv I do this and get minimum trouble especially during the upgrade to a Quarterly release:-) Thanks Thank you for the tip. now

pkg_rolling-replace better with options s or u first

2012-06-05 Thread Edward M
Hi,,:-) it is better to start pkg_rolling-relpace with options ´s´ f or with option ´u´ or it does not realliy matter with which option i start using with when the rolling process is started? thanks

Re: pkg_rolling-replace better with options s or u first

2012-06-05 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Edward M martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote: it is better to start  pkg_rolling-relpace  with options ´s´ f or with option ´u´ or it does not realliy matter with which option i  start using with  when  the rolling process is started? Order of argument does not

Re: pkg_rolling-replace better with options s or u first

2012-06-05 Thread Edward M
On 06/05/2012 08:33 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote: On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Edward Mmartinezedward...@gmail.com wrote: it is better to start pkg_rolling-relpace with options ´s´ f or with option ´u´ or it does not realliy matter with which option i start using with when the rolling