hey,
i finally finished the pkgsrc bulk build for 1.10 and these are the results:
http://chlamydia.fs.ei.tum.de/~corecode/unsorted/bulkbuild/20070726.2220/meta/report.html
There is quite some breakage, please go down the list and check if you can fix
an issue for the package you'd like to be
I completed two pkgsrc bulk builds. The following is from the report it
generated. (The first bulk build reporting didn't work.)
The actual count of packages I see on the system is 2851 packages. Some
significant packages that were packaged:
apache 1
perl
xorg-server
thttpd
This is great! Keep up the good work!
--
- Liam J. Foy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I completed two pkgsrc bulk builds. The following is from the report it
generated. (The first bulk build reporting didn't work.)
hey this looks really great!
is this the standard output of a pkgsrc bulk run? Or did you do some
serious scripting yourself?
cheers
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
I completed two pkgsrc bulk builds. The following is from the report it
generated. (The first bulk build reporting didn't work.)
hey this looks really great!
is this the standard output of a pkgsrc bulk run? Or did you do some serious
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:00:17AM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
PackageBreaks Maintainer
--
lang/tcl 139 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's broken with this? I thought I had the necessary patches in my
:
:On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
:
: I completed two pkgsrc bulk builds. The following is from the report it
: generated. (The first bulk build reporting didn't work.)
:
: hey this looks really great!
:
: is this the standard output of a pkgsrc bulk run? Or did you do
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The report shouldn't eat up all that much bandwidth (at least not compared
to e.g. downloading the package sources), so I wouldn't worry about it.
The report links to the build logs which are many megabytes in size,
totalling:
573M
On 31 Aug 2005, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
PackageBreaks Maintainer
--
lang/tcl 139 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's broken with this? I thought I had the necessary patches in my
patch set.
I