Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
It seems that maybe we should ship with /etc/rc.d set by default.
-1 for me - usual 'system is system and pkgsrc is pkgsrc' reasoning.
(and just had my tweaked apache start script botched by pkgsrc)
pkgsrc / rcng are super flexible - isn't there some way to spec the
Thomas Nikolajsen wrote:
rc variable namespace still isn't separated, e.g. no reserved name space
for base rc scripts, any ideas for this?
this could probably be tweaked somehow in the scan / startup sequence
with rcorder(1) statements.. e.g. pass 1 for 'basic init', pass 2 for
'secondary
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Pierre Abbat wrote:
PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS=yes
But the next line is
RCD_SCRIPTS_DIR=/usr/pkg/share/examples/rc.d
(That value is for RCD_SCRIPTS_EXAMPLEDIR.)
That is broken. The default already is
RCD_SCRIPTS_DIR?= /etc/rc.d
So if I set that to /etc/rc.d, then
But I think I'd prefer /usr/pkg/etc/rc.d, to have a clean separation between
base and pkgsrc rc scripts (which might have the same names).
I can second this; please make /usr/pkg/etc/rc.d default for pkgsrc;
it is just too messy to use /etc/rc.d for non base scripts IMHO.
(BIND removal
On Saturday 15 May 2010 23:07:21 Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
It's a local setting, not one set at bulk package build time:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2010/05/14/msg005443.html
I just checked mine, and it's on.
PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS=yes
But the next line is
RCD_SCRIPTS_DIR=
Am 16.05.2010 12:05, schrieb Pierre Abbat:
On Saturday 15 May 2010 23:07:21 Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
It's a local setting, not one set at bulk package build time:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2010/05/14/msg005443.html
I just checked mine, and it's on.
Where did you check? In your
On Sun, May 16, 2010 6:24 am, Sascha Wildner wrote:
Yeah, if RCD_SCRIPTS_DIR isn't set in /usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf, then
/etc/rc.d should be the default.
It seems that maybe we should ship with /etc/rc.d set by default. I don't
recall if there was discussion of this before. People will still
On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:46:54 Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
It seems that maybe we should ship with /etc/rc.d set by default. I don't
recall if there was discussion of this before. People will still have to
enable it via rc.conf anyway.
There was, when I installed kdm. I think it is good to set
On Thu, May 13, 2010 11:54 pm, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
My guess is that in order for this to work with pkgin, Justin would have
to set PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS in the mk.conf that he uses in his bulk builds.
I would have guessed the opposite - that it's read by pkg_add during the
binary install and
I installed Apache a couple of weeks ago and would like to start it. There is
no apache file in /etc/rc.d. There is a
file /usr/pkg/share/examples/rc.d/apache. Why doesn't the package put this
file in /etc/rc.d? I could copy the file there, but if I upgraded the
package, and the rc.d script
Am 14.05.2010 02:52, schrieb Pierre Abbat:
I installed Apache a couple of weeks ago and would like to start it. There is
no apache file in /etc/rc.d. There is a
file /usr/pkg/share/examples/rc.d/apache. Why doesn't the package put this
file in /etc/rc.d? I could copy the file there, but if I
On Thursday 13 May 2010 21:10:24 Sascha Wildner wrote:
pkgsrc has a PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS option that - if set to YES in
/usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf - will copy rc.d scripts automatically to /etc/rc.d.
Does pkgin have such an option, or should I just copy the script?
Pierre
--
When a barnacle settles
Am 14.05.2010 04:01, schrieb Pierre Abbat:
On Thursday 13 May 2010 21:10:24 Sascha Wildner wrote:
pkgsrc has a PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS option that - if set to YES in
/usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf - will copy rc.d scripts automatically to /etc/rc.d.
Does pkgin have such an option, or should I just copy the
On Thu, May 13, 2010 10:25 pm, Sascha Wildner wrote:
Am 14.05.2010 04:01, schrieb Pierre Abbat:
On Thursday 13 May 2010 21:10:24 Sascha Wildner wrote:
pkgsrc has a PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS option that - if set to YES in
/usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf - will copy rc.d scripts automatically to
/etc/rc.d.
Does
14 matches
Mail list logo
