Tomaž Borštnar wrote:
Hello!
Seems like 3Ware is dropping support for FreeBSD 4.x. New drivers
and management tools wants FreeBSD 5.4. Time to let them know that we
exist and want working support for management tools too?
Tomaž
I don't know what mileage you will get here, unless you
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Tomaž Borštnar wrote:
Hello!
Seems like 3Ware is dropping support for FreeBSD 4.x. New drivers
and management tools wants FreeBSD 5.4. Time to let them know that we
exist and want working support for management tools too?
Tomaž
I don't know what mileage you will
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:26:29PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
As for Apache: Go through the code looking for checks for FreeBSD and add
similar checks for DragonFly as appropriate. And this needs to be sent
upstream to apache.org also.
Hm. I thought it worked. I
If I want to write an assembly language program without using libc, is it ok
to use mmap and a file descriptor of -1 to allocate memory?
jm
--
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
What the hell is a gander, anyway?
:
:
:If I want to write an assembly language program without using libc, is it ok
:to use mmap and a file descriptor of -1 to allocate memory?
:
:jm
Yes, but it's best to do it in large chunks.
-Matt
Matthew
The 1.2 release has been officially bumped to 1.2.6.
-Matt
Hiten Pandya wrote:
I don't know what mileage you will get here, unless you and someone like
DR can convince that there are enough DF-based boxes in production which
use 3ware products.
Either support DFLy directly or keep FreeBSD4 support. I think later is easier
for them :)
Tomaž
Tomaž Borštnar wrote:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
I don't know what mileage you will get here, unless you and someone
like DR can convince that there are enough DF-based boxes in
production which use 3ware products.
Either support DFLy directly or keep FreeBSD4 support. I think later is
easier for
