Re: OpenOffice
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: On Wed, January 20, 2010 5:14 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote: I tried building openoffice2 and it said it's not available on DragonFly. FreeBSD and NetBSD, yes, but not DFly. How come? And openoffice3 gave me Could not find ../../devel/xulrunner/buildlink3.mk and quit. Openoffice2 probably just never was tested on DragonFly; looking at the Makefile, it's pretty specific about supported versions. Openoffice3 also fails with a openoffice3-3.1.1nb1 is not available for DragonFly-2.4.1-i386 error on the last 2.4.1 i386 bulk build, so I bet it's a similar issue there. It may just be a matter of someone familiar with the build process needing to poke at it. The build process is a mess. It would need a considerable time investment to be rendered usable. If you want to use OpenOffice on DragonFly, your best bet is the linux binary in misc/openoffice3-bin. And then it manages to crash if you use a hammer filesystem... There are some workarounds in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@crater.dragonflybsd.org/msg08862.html Nowadays, I use koffice. It's native and fast. -- Francois Tigeot
Re: OpenOffice
On Thursday 21 January 2010 03:04:28 Francois Tigeot wrote: If you want to use OpenOffice on DragonFly, your best bet is the linux binary in misc/openoffice3-bin. And then it manages to crash if you use a hammer filesystem... There are some workarounds in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@crater.dragonflybsd.org/msg08862.html Nowadays, I use koffice. It's native and fast. I installed OO3 and got this when I tried to run it: -bash-3.2$ sh: /dev/null: Permission denied javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! /etc/host.conf: line 2: bad command `hosts' /etc/host.conf: line 3: bad command `dns' Fontconfig error: conf.d, line 1: no element found Looks like it's trying to run both /dev/null and /etc/hosts. I made the whole disk Hammer. Is there a way to shrink it a bit to make a small UFS? I installed koffice too, but I've seen files show up mangled on koffice and correctly on OpenOffice. Pierre -- Jews use a lunisolar calendar; Muslims use a solely lunar calendar.
BIND updated to 9.5.2-P2
I updated BIND to v9.5.2-P2 in master. This fixes a bug related to DNSSEC. So anyone using DNSSEC should consider updating sooner than later. Ref: https://www.isc.org/advisories/CVE-2010-0097 Jan PS: Thanks to Aggelos for pointing me to the update.
Re: BIND updated to 9.5.2-P2
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, lentferj wrote: I updated BIND to v9.5.2-P2 in master. This fixes a bug related to DNSSEC. So anyone using DNSSEC should consider updating sooner than later. Ref: https://www.isc.org/advisories/CVE-2010-0097 If anyone is using DNSSEC (meaning have it built with openssl, have the dnssec enabled and have a key setup), please let me know. Off list is fine. I am just curious how many in this community really use DNSSEC. (Yes, I am DNSSEC-signed :)
