Danial Thom wrote:
--- Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:26:17PM +0200, Erik
P. Skaalerud wrote:
Joseph Garcia wrote:
I was using ifconfig when it occurred to me
how non-intuitive it is
having to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask
when adding an
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
:~ > It's not that easy. This has nothing to do with the interface, but is a
:| restriction from the routing stack. Once that restriction goes away,
:| there's no reason why aliases wouldn't allow it too.
:
:That's true, this point isn't exactly an
Max Okumoto wrote:
Has anyone looked at the recent work on ifconfig that Sam Leffler
is doing? I thought he was cleaning up alot of the code in there.
Max Okumoto
The ifconfig in FreeBSD is certainly nice, especially its command parser
which I am quite fond of. I am thinking of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
|>Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
|>~ > It's not that easy. This has nothing to do with the interface, but
is a
|>| restriction from the routing stack. Once tha
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
:~ > It's not that easy. This has nothing to do with the interface, but is a
:| restriction from the routing stack. Once that restriction goes away,
:| there's no reason why aliases wouldn't allow it too.
:
:That's true, this point isn't exactly an
:Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
:~ > It's not that easy. This has nothing to do with the interface, but is a
:| restriction from the routing stack. Once that restriction goes away,
:| there's no reason why aliases wouldn't allow it too.
:
:That's true, this point isn't exactly an ifconfig issue. Howeve
--- Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:26:17PM +0200, Erik
> P. Skaalerud wrote:
> > Joseph Garcia wrote:
> > >I was using ifconfig when it occurred to me
> how non-intuitive it is
> > >having to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask
> when adding an address
>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> ~ > It's not that easy. This has nothing to do with the interface, but is a
> | restriction from the routing stack. Once that restriction goes away,
> | there's no reason why aliases wouldn't allow it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
~ > It's not that easy. This has nothing to do with the interface, but is a
| restriction from the routing stack. Once that restriction goes away,
| there's no reason why aliases wouldn't allow it too.
That's true, this poin
Joseph Garcia wrote:
Greetings.
I just wanted to bounce some ideas off of you guys. It’s petty stuff,
but it’s usability feedback nonetheless.
First let me start off by quoting the ifcconfig(8) man page:
"The ifconfig utility is used to assign an address to a network
interface and/or configure
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:26:17PM +0200, Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:
> Joseph Garcia wrote:
> >I was using ifconfig when it occurred to me how non-intuitive it is
> >having to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask when adding an address
> >that is on the same subnet as an address already on the interfac
Joseph Garcia wrote:
I was using ifconfig when it occurred to me how non-intuitive it is
having to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask when adding an address
that is on the same subnet as an address already on the interface. For
example, if you already have 192.168.0.1/24 on fxp0, then you should
Joseph Garcia wrote:
> ifconfig fxp0 add 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
>instead of:
>
> ifconfig fxp0 add 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255
>
>
Seconded. I fell into this trap more than once when working with FreeBSD.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Replying to two emails below ...
Tomaz Borstnar wrote:
checking which template to use... configure: error: 'dragonfly' is not a
valid template name. Use 'list' for a list.
How did you apply my patch?
cd /usr/pkgsrc
patch < pkgsrc-databases-postgresql80.diff
it went
14 matches
Mail list logo
