Erik Wikström wrote:
Anyone here agree that MD5 and SHA1 are 'weak' crypto? Any other
thoughts about the subject?
I would not say that MD5 and SHA1 are weak, but considering that some
companies run the same version of a MS-product for ages and considering
the reports of attacks against then,
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Dave Hayes wrote:
Trying to get samba running on Preview-1.3.6:
smbd in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense
[2005/09/21 18:37:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
Heh. It's quite obvious that the person who came up with the warning
message for free()
For those, like me, who are not at ease with mathematics but still want
to have a practical understanding of the problem, I can only recommand
O'Reilly's Secure programming Cookbook for C and C++. Although I don't
cod in C, it gave me a good insight into applied crypto and security
in
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
[...]
Nevertheless they have been broken recently (about one year) and for MD5
for example single bits can be changed...
Okay, that's why I asked -- I didn't know that. But why take a year
to break a secure hash when you can use a buffer overrun to gain
walt wrote:
Okay, that's why I asked -- I didn't know that. But why take a year
to break a secure hash when you can use a buffer overrun to gain
access to ten thousand Windows machines in a few minutes ;o)
Same can be said of the hundreds of thousands of Apache installations
out there. And
walt wrote:
Nevertheless they have been broken recently (about one year) and for
MD5 for example single bits can be changed...
Okay, that's why I asked -- I didn't know that. But why take a year
to break a secure hash when you can use a buffer overrun to gain
access to ten thousand Windows
Dave Hayes wrote:
Trying to get samba running on Preview-1.3.6:
smbd in free(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense
[2005/09/21 18:37:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
===
[2005/09/21 18:37:11, 0]
On 22.09.2005, at 18:20, David wrote:
I have been trying ( with no luck) to get a extended dos partition to
mount W2K see's it as the D drive. The Primary partition mount just
fine..
doing a
Mount_msdos /dev/ad0s5 /dos_d
returns no such file or directory
sh MAKEDEV ad0s5a
Thanks that did it! I thoght that may be the fix but I am so new
to this I really didnt know.
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
On 22.09.2005, at 18:20, David wrote:
I have been trying ( with no luck) to get a extended dos partition to
mount W2K see's it as the D drive. The
:After playing around a little, I found that the following patch makes
:suspend/resume work:
:..
:
:
:icu_reinit() has been in previous FreeBSD versions of acpi_wakeup.c.
:
:I am not sure, whether this is the right way to fix it though.
:
: Johannes
Nice work! It does make sense...
10 matches
Mail list logo
