Hello,
I installed DragonFly BSD 1.4 quite some time ago. I
have also got a big ReiserFS partition on which I have
60GB+ of data.
I'm trying to move the data from the ReiserFS to a
DFBSD slice (UFS). Because DFBSD doesn't have ReiserFS
support so I'm trying to use a FBSD LiveCD but I need
to
Hello,
I installed DragonFly BSD 1.4 quite some time ago. I
have also got a big ReiserFS partition on which I have
60GB+ of data.
I'm trying to move the data from the ReiserFS to a
DFBSD slice (UFS). Because DFBSD doesn't have ReiserFS
support so I'm trying to use a FBSD LiveCD but I need
to
Ben Cadieux wrote:
Just say the word and I'll fire the source off your way - it's in
nasm. I'll need to mod it to add support for other things though,
like multiple hard disks. (FreeBSD has an F5-Disk2 option).
Thanks for your offer, yet, what's the gain with your MBR? Or put
differently:
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Thanks for your offer, yet, what's the gain with your MBR? Or put
differently: what's wrong with the one from FreeBSD?
One thing at least: Due to cramped space it's not easily possible to
assign more descriptive texts for the menu choices based on the sysid.
Ben Cadieux wrote:
I wrote an MBR at one point - it's quite similar to FreeBSD's, except
instead of function keys it looks something like this:
Does that also support booting the last booted OS like our boot0 or
does it have the concept of a default choice which is used when the
user does
May this be of any interest too?
http://www.cs.kau.se/cs/education/courses/davddiss/PerHrapp.pdf
--
Mvh - Stefan -
This is a late reply, but better late than never. ;-)
Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to DragonFly, I have several Problem with my keyboard. My
preferred locale is en_GB.UTF-8 and I want to use UTF-8 as the input
charset (vi, etc.), but it doesn't work . Some
Sascha Wildner wrote:
cut wiki spam
How about requiring a valid e-mail address for users and when content is
changed by that user a mail is generated and send to the users mail
address with a link that activates the changes?
--
mph
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:37:58 -0600
ejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into this same problem and applied your patch to exclude
mlockall with the same results. I then looked into the patch-ad file,
noticing it hadn't been DragonFly-ized yet. I applied the attached
I noticed that and
On 3/6/06, Steve O'Hara-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:09:50 +
Steve O'Hara-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I managed to get dvd+rw tools to build with a small change to
the existing pkgsrc patches (to exclude the call to mlockall for DragonFly
It would be nice to have some better descriptions for people that like
to multi-boot (like me).
At this point there's lots of room, we'll see when I've added more
features. I can always figure out a way to optimize it. At the
moment it just shows fat/ntfs as being Windows - since there's
Thanks for your offer, yet, what's the gain with your MBR? Or put
differently: what's wrong with the one from FreeBSD?
Well, what would you like to see different? I never really decided on
anything...but perhaps a boot from floppy option? A visual
countdown? When all the journaling
On 2006-03-08 10:48, Steve Mynott wrote:
Matt on bsdtalk podcast!
http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
Sync'd through to my iPod fine and I listened to it on the train to
work - very interesting!
Cheers Steve
This reminded me of the (perhaps slightly old) BayLISA-talk which is now
available for
Snip/
At the moment it just shows fat/ntfs as being Windows - since
there's likely very few people booting DOS on Fat in comparison.
But I guess we'd need a vote on what file systems should say what :)
Snip/
I would suggest that FAT come out saying DOS/Win9x and NTFS say WinNT
+. My reason
I would suggest that FAT come out saying DOS/Win9x and NTFS say WinNT
+. My reason for that is based on the fact that the old version of
That sounds reasonable enough; everyone agree?
Oh and yea, 3.x, 9x and ME all boot DOS underneath
ME Kind of just pretended it wasn't there.
- BC
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Ben Cadieux wrote:
I would suggest that FAT come out saying DOS/Win9x and NTFS say WinNT
+. My reason for that is based on the fact that the old version of
That sounds reasonable enough; everyone agree?
Well ... if we/you want to Do It Right, the boot selector really
I was slightly blown away when I noticed that Maxime
Henrion has imported csup into the 'contrib' section
of FreeBSD. I'm building the FreeBSD world now, so
I haven't actually tried using csup yet.
Maxime specifically mentions DragonFly in his README
file, so I'm assuming that some brainiac from
Ok, thanks. I'm tired and was occoupied all day,
probably I'll try it in the afternoon/night. If you
remember something more or the command was different,
say it ;)
Best regards,
timofonic
(the disklabel was from dfly)
--- walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Jose timofonic wrote:
...I'm
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
See the csup import? thread in this month's users archive.
I tried building wip/csup and got a bunch of 'already defined'
and missing header errors.
I tried copying the /usr/src/contrib/csup directory from FBSD
which compiles and works perfectly on
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, walt wrote:
I tried building wip/csup and got a bunch of 'already defined'
and missing header errors.
I tried copying the /usr/src/contrib/csup directory from FBSD
which compiles and works perfectly on DFly with no modification.
Something is different between the two,
Magnus Eriksson wrote:
Hmm. I noticed that the man pages supposedly documenting the booting
process aren't that well written (imho), maybe that's something I could
look at.
That would be great.
Sascha
--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx
I am trying to track down why ktrace shows
RET select -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
But errno has 672964768.
The code uses selecterr = errno or
selecterr = (* __error());
selecterr is an int.
And prints out that selecterr.
Any ideas on where 672964768 is coming from?
Jeremy C.
22 matches
Mail list logo
