On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But errno has 672964768.
>
> I suspect a bug in the thread switching code of libc_r, but didn't have
> time to fully investigate it. Can you try to create a testcase based on
> what the code is doing?
Not yet.
The libX11 from pkgsrc package has s
On Fri, 11 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the tip. As an aside, since my system doesn't have SCSI,
> RAID, wireless,... with fbsd I would remove these drivers from the
> kernel. I take it that is not the strategy with Dragonfly or is
> something else going on?
I had a look at
Matt,
Thanks for the tip. As an aside, since my system doesn't have SCSI, RAID,
wireless,... with fbsd I would remove these
drivers from the kernel. I take it that is not the strategy with Dragonfly or
is something else going on?
Joe
--
- ( | ) fan
---
Kevin L. Kane wrote:
Not sure if this is relevant, but when malloc option G is enabled and
anything using libc_r is ran it breaks. Definitely pointing to
something being off in libc_r, not sure if this is the same problem or
helpful in anyway.
I'd rather like to see libthread_xu fully function
Sascha Wildner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Due to cramped space it's not easily possible to
> assign more descriptive texts for the menu choices
> based on the sysid.
...
> It would be nice to have some better descriptions
> for people that like to multi-boot (like me).
It seems hard to fi
Not sure if this is relevant, but when malloc option G is enabled and
anything using libc_r is ran it breaks. Definitely pointing to
something being off in libc_r, not sure if this is the same problem or
helpful in anyway.
-Kevin
On 3/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:01:03PM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I am trying to track down why ktrace shows
> RET select -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
>
> But errno has 672964768.
I suspect a bug in the thread switching code of libc_r, but didn't have
time to fully investigate it. Can y
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:06:35 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:15:22PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > Yup. That's &errno instead of errno.
>
> Nope, it isn't. I don't know why, but gdb returns just garbage. I'll do
> some testing with thread local variables, I exp
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:15:22PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Yup. That's &errno instead of errno.
Nope, it isn't. I don't know why, but gdb returns just garbage. I'll do
some testing with thread local variables, I expect gdb is doing junk
with them.
Joerg
:Good morning,
:
:I am trying to get to 1.4.2, starting with a fresh CD install of 1.4.0 and
cvsup the diff. "make buildworld" completed
:successfully. "make buildkernel KERNELCONF=KERNEL1" is blowing up. I have
tried both the GENERIC kernel and a custom
:slimmed down kernel. The same point
:I am trying to track it down. I first just ran the cc line by adding -E to
:it. But it didn't show it redefined, but I may have overlooked something.
:
:http://pilchuck.reedmedia.net/jeremy/tmp-kuhcy847/WaitFor.c-preprocessor-output
:
:(141951 bytes)
:
:Jump down to "selecterr = ".
:
:I built ab
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Yup. That's &errno instead of errno. I would expect that to occur
> if 'errno' is #define'd more then once since sys/errno.h basically
> depends on errno not already being defined. When it is multiply
> defined the trick sys/errno.h us
Good morning,
I am trying to get to 1.4.2, starting with a fresh CD install of 1.4.0 and
cvsup the diff. "make buildworld" completed
successfully. "make buildkernel KERNELCONF=KERNEL1" is blowing up. I have
tried both the GENERIC kernel and a custom
slimmed down kernel. The same point in th
13 matches
Mail list logo
