On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:29:46AM -0700, walt wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest pkgsrc xine-lib, and I'm getting an
error message I've never seen before:
It should have been fixed yesterday (together with the spinning problem).
Joerg
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Francis Gudin wrote:
On 14-08-2006, Saverio Iacovelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try in /usr/pkgsrc/net/
url2pkg
http://download.pureftpd.org/pub/ucarp/ucarp-1.2.tar.gz
but there is the following error message:
Run this in .../pkgsrc/foo/bar !
So, follow
Am 15.08.2006 um 21:02 schrieb Vivek Ayer:
However, the only awkward thing is the bash script used.
Hmm. You are the second person considering bash as evil. What might
be the reason for this?
Markus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, walt wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:29:46AM -0700, walt wrote:
I'm trying to compile the latest pkgsrc xine-lib, and I'm getting an
error message I've never seen before:
It should have been fixed yesterday (together
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:50:34PM -0700, walt wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, walt wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
why would -fno-unit-at-a-time be
active on DF but not on NBSD (or linux)?
Because unit-at-a-time and propolice have a bad
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:50:34PM -0700, walt wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
My last OT question for today: I thought that ssp was just a newer
name for propolice. Am I wrong about this?
Technically, SSP is the name of a class of algorithms, propolice being
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:22:52PM -0700, walt wrote:
The gcc on my gentoo-linux box has ssp enabled by default (or so
it claims). Seems to me that propolice would be implied by ssp,
yes? But xine-lib compiles with no problems on gentoo.
Which version of GCC? 4.1 has a somewhat different
The error is coming from this test in url2pkg:
if [ ! -f ../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk ]; then
echo Run this in .../pkgsrc/foo/bar !
exit 1
fi
So, what happens if you do this:
#cd /usr/pkgsrc/net/ucarp
#ls ../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk
So, I have test.txt in /usr/pkgsrc directory:
#cat
Don't run it in a directory already in use.
cd /usr/pkgsrc # or wherever you keep it
mkdir -p NEW/ucarp
cd NEW/ucarp
url2pkg
http://download.pureftpd.org/pub/ucarp/ucarp-1.2.tar.gz
Anyways, it doesn't not make sense to create a new
package from scratch
when it already exists.
Just
On 2006-08-15 21:52, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Am 15.08.2006 um 21:02 schrieb Vivek Ayer:
However, the only awkward thing is the bash script used.
Hmm. You are the second person considering bash as evil. What might be the
reason for this?
The problem is the licensing. Many BSD users prefer that
Saverio Iacovelli wrote:
The error is coming from this test in url2pkg:
if [ ! -f ../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk ]; then
echo Run this in .../pkgsrc/foo/bar !
exit 1
fi
So, what happens if you do this:
#cd /usr/pkgsrc/net/ucarp
#ls ../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk
So, I have test.txt in
Don't run it in a directory already in use.
cd /usr/pkgsrc # or wherever you keep it
mkdir -p NEW/ucarp
cd NEW/ucarp
url2pkg
http://download.pureftpd.org/pub/ucarp/ucarp-1.2.tar.gz
Anyways, it doesn't not make sense to create a new
package from scratch
when it already
: Am 15.08.2006 um 21:02 schrieb Vivek Ayer:
:
: However, the only awkward thing is the bash script used.
:
: Hmm. You are the second person considering bash as evil. What might be the
: reason for this?
:
:The problem is the licensing. Many BSD users prefer that essential or
:standard
13 matches
Mail list logo
