Many thanks and congratulations for this briliant piece of work!
Cheers,
Nuno
Hi,
I have 1.6.0 running and just downloaded and burned 1.8.0, But for a
proper upgrade and keeping applications and settings installed, I
suppose I shouldn't use the cd but rather upgrade according to the handbook?
Thanks
Huub
Huub wrote:
Hi,
I have 1.6.0 running and just downloaded and burned 1.8.0, But for a
proper upgrade and keeping applications and settings installed, I
suppose I shouldn't use the cd but rather upgrade according to the
handbook?
Just check out a copy of the 1.8 sources and then do:
cd
:Besides the finalization of vkernel, what else can we expect into 2.0? There
are many long-awaited (not only by me) features and additions:
:- ZFS
I am seriously considering our options with regards to ZFS or a
ZFS-like filesystem. We clearly need something to replace UFS,
but I
Hi Matt,
first congratulation for your 1.8 release, a solid and tremendous
progress. some questions (hopefully not too far from the scope :) ...
On 1/31/07, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Besides the finalization of vkernel, what else can we expect into 2.0? There
are many
Here's the error. I have attempted building several times including
from a cleaned /usr/src and cvsup with tag=. and
tag=DragonFly_RELEASE_1_8_Slip
cc -O -pipe -mtune=pentiumpro
-I/usr/src/secure/libexec/sftp-server/../../lib/libssh
Just an idea for thought over your next coffee...
I'm if it would be to conceivably possible to move a vkernel process(and any
sub-processes it had) to another host? It'd have to stop temporarily, or at
least, slow down immensely while pumping all the userland data inside the
vkernel to the other
On 2/1/07, Nigel Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an idea for thought over your next coffee...
I'm if it would be to conceivably possible to move a vkernel process(and any
sub-processes it had) to another host? It'd have to stop temporarily, or at
least, slow down immensely while pumping all
IMPORTANT NOTICE - The contents of this e-mail may be
confidential and is
intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named herein. Any
unauthorised use of the contents is expressly prohibited.
If you have
received the e-mail in error, please contact the sender by telephone
On Wed, January 31, 2007 3:18 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I am seriously considering our options with regards to ZFS or a
ZFS-like filesystem. We clearly need something to replace UFS,
but I am a bit worried that porting ZFS would be as much work
as simply designing a new
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:35:42 -0500 (EST)
Justin C. Sherrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, January 31, 2007 3:18 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I am seriously considering our options with regards to ZFS or a
ZFS-like filesystem. We clearly need something to replace UFS,
but I
There's a huge niche that desperately needs to be filled for systems
that have huge
numbers of small files. ReiserFS went some of the way towards doing
that, but at
this point has pretty much officially flopped, and still has huge
issues, not the least
of which are Hans' personal ones. XFS
12 matches
Mail list logo