Eric wrote:
I've installed Dragonfly on a Dell Optiplex with a normal old fashion box monitor with no problem. However, when I tried running Dragonfly on a Dimension with a flat panel FP153 monitor, the console screen turns a pale green right after booting. I've had similar problems with
Is it wrong? What are the possible implications?
Petr
When exactly is right after booting?
After the countdown ends after the splash screen with the dragonfly. Before
that everything is black and white and looks good. Then things get ugly
(unless you like lime green!).
--
Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 3 May 2007 19:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:The green tint goes away after I start X, and when I close X and go back
:into console, the console is the normal black and white. Its not a
:hardware issue, since the problem doesnt replicate in other BSD's
Eric wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007 19:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:The green tint goes away after I start X, and when I close X and go back
:into console, the console is the normal black and white. Its not a
:hardware issue, since the problem doesnt replicate in
Disregard, just read the man page. Figured it out.
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Eric wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007 19:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:The green tint goes away after I start X, and when I close X and go back
:into console, the console is the normal black and
Eric wrote:
I've installed Dragonfly on a Dell Optiplex with a normal old fashion box monitor with no problem. However, when I tried running Dragonfly on a Dimension with a flat panel FP153 monitor, the console screen turns a pale green right after booting. I've had similar problems with
Is there a way to set vidcontrol during start-up? I played with it
using VMWare but after rebooting it goes back to the old video mode.
If the same happens with a regular hard drive install I don't think it
will solve the issue.
Maybe /etc/rc.d/syscons will help.
And see the rc.conf(5)
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:49:42PM +1000, Petr Janda wrote:
Is it wrong? What are the possible implications?
It can be done with some care. The problem is that the current ARP
behaviour has some issues, e.g. it complains about receiving ARP answers
on the wrong interface etc.
Joerg
:
: Is it wrong? What are the possible implications?
:
:Petr
As Joerg said, it can be done. But there usually is no reason
to actually want to do that. You can just use IP aliases with
ifconfig to give a single interface multiple IP addresses within
the same subnet (or on
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:49:42PM +1000, Petr Janda wrote:
Is it wrong? What are the possible implications?
It can be done with some care. The problem is that the current ARP
behaviour has some issues, e.g. it complains about receiving ARP answers
on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
