Re: Samba LDAP
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:32:07PM -0600, Thomas Donnelly wrote: >> I have been watching the DragonFlyBSD project for a few months now and >> so >> far it seems very promising. We are looking at doing a 2 server setup of >> samba and ldap as a cluster/redundant pair. After looking around, it >> seemed >> that DragonFlyBSD would be a good choice. > > After using such a setup for over 2 years -- avoid it if you can. The > LDAP part I mean. > > Joerg > Just out of curiousity, why? I think it would be nice being that our firewall interfaces with it. What are the major drawbacks of this system?
Re: Samba LDAP
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:32:07PM -0600, Thomas Donnelly wrote: > I have been watching the DragonFlyBSD project for a few months now and so > far it seems very promising. We are looking at doing a 2 server setup of > samba and ldap as a cluster/redundant pair. After looking around, it seemed > that DragonFlyBSD would be a good choice. After using such a setup for over 2 years -- avoid it if you can. The LDAP part I mean. Joerg
Re: Fetch pkgsrc index with pkg_search
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:19:27PM +0100, Matthias Schmidt wrote: > Thanks, I wasn't aware of this file. The file is not very parser > friendly, compared with the INDEX file :) Huh? That file is easy to process with awk(1), that makes it by definition parser friendly :-) Joerg