Re: USB scanner unrecognized on 1.11-DEVELOPMENT

2008-01-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:06:21AM +0100, Matthias Schmidt wrote: * Francois Tigeot wrote: I recently upgraded a machine from Dragonfly 1.10.1 to a recent 1.11.0-DEVELOPMENT (as of today). An Epson Perfection 1240U USB scanner which worked fine with 1.10.1 is now unrecognized.

Re: USB scanner unrecognized on 1.11-DEVELOPMENT

2008-01-16 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Hasso Tepper wrote: Francois Tigeot wrote: However, I found out there's was a difference between a standalone uscanner module and one compiled in the kernel. Standalone module: - original - nothing - patched - nothing Note that loading module doesn't rescan devices. You have

Re: USB scanner unrecognized on 1.11-DEVELOPMENT

2008-01-16 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
On Jan 16, 2008 8:14 PM, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hasso Tepper wrote: Francois Tigeot wrote: However, I found out there's was a difference between a standalone uscanner module and one compiled in the kernel. Standalone module: - original - nothing

Re: cvsup

2008-01-16 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:35:48AM +, Vincent Stemen wrote: I am not clear how to access it. Try something like the attached script. Joerg update.sh Description: Bourne shell script

Re: USB scanner unrecognized on 1.11-DEVELOPMENT

2008-01-16 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 8:14 PM, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hasso Tepper wrote: Francois Tigeot wrote: However, I found out there's was a difference between a standalone uscanner module and one compiled in the kernel. Standalone module: - original

USB stack (was: USB scanner unrecognized ...)

2008-01-16 Thread Hasso Tepper
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: Then devices should be probed and if there is a better match than ugen and if the ugen device is not open, it should be detached from ugen and attached to the new driver. Do you think this would be possible? There is a lot of things that suck in USB stack all

Re: USB stack

2008-01-16 Thread Bill Hacker
Hasso Tepper wrote: Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: Then devices should be probed and if there is a better match than ugen and if the ugen device is not open, it should be detached from ugen and attached to the new driver. Do you think this would be possible? There is a lot of things that

Re: USB scanner unrecognized on 1.11-DEVELOPMENT

2008-01-16 Thread Francois Tigeot
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:45:49PM +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote: Francois Tigeot wrote: However, I found out there's was a difference between a standalone uscanner module and one compiled in the kernel. Standalone module: - original - nothing - patched - nothing Note that

Re: USB stack (was: USB scanner unrecognized ...)

2008-01-16 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:20:42 +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote: Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: Then devices should be probed and if there is a better match than ugen and if the ugen device is not open, it should be detached from ugen and attached to the new driver. Do you think this would be