Re: pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Sun, May 11, 2008 12:58 pm, Hasso Tepper wrote: >> In other words 21.2% of pkg-src packages do not compile correctly as of >> now. > > Quite depressing I have to say :). But situation should be much better > already. I had some hours to look at reports during last days and I > reported most of

Re: Fortran in the base

2008-05-11 Thread Sascha Wildner
Hasso Tepper wrote: The question is what we should do? Due to fact that it's quite widely used, we should do something, but what? I'd prefer to add fortran into gcc-4.1 as well. Are there objections? If you want to add it, I wouldn't object. Sascha -- http://yoyodyne.ath.cx

Re: Fortran in the base

2008-05-11 Thread Rumko
Hasso Tepper wrote: > Quite a big number of pkgsrc build failures come from fact that we don't > have Fortran compiler in our gcc-4.1. We have it in gcc-3.4 though, but > for some reason not in gcc-4.1. > > The question is what we should do? Due to fact that it's quite widely > used, we should do

Re: 7-Zip / Bzip2

2008-05-11 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: >> Instead of pulling in another app, consider pulling in libarchive and >> friends from FreeBSD 6+, and then adding 7z support to that. > > You know that

Fortran in the base

2008-05-11 Thread Hasso Tepper
Quite a big number of pkgsrc build failures come from fact that we don't have Fortran compiler in our gcc-4.1. We have it in gcc-3.4 though, but for some reason not in gcc-4.1. The question is what we should do? Due to fact that it's quite widely used, we should do something, but what? I'd pref

Re: 7-Zip / Bzip2

2008-05-11 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > Instead of pulling in another app, consider pulling in libarchive and > friends from FreeBSD 6+, and then adding 7z support to that. You know that one of the two reasons I wrote the compression_program support in libarchive was 7z's l

Re: 7-Zip / Bzip2

2008-05-11 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sun, 11 May 2008 10:46:38 -0700 "Freddie Cash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Compression algorithms are something that should be handled via an > extendle library. And the front-end apps (gzip, bzip2, 7z, etc) > should just use that library to do the heavy lifting. > > Instead of pulling in an

Re: 7-Zip / Bzip2

2008-05-11 Thread Freddie Cash
Compression algorithms are something that should be handled via an extendle library. And the front-end apps (gzip, bzip2, 7z, etc) should just use that library to do the heavy lifting. Instead of pulling in another app, consider pulling in libarchive and friends from FreeBSD 6+, and then adding 7

Re: pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Matthew Dillon
:So: I was thinking I would copy his files to pkgbox.dragonflybsd.org, :along with some 1.12 packages tuxillo built, so that they could be :mirrored from the same place. : :Any objections? We could use more binary package mirrors. : :Robert - make sure you send the report along to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Hasso Tepper
Robert Luciani wrote: > As Simon pointed out, many "big" packages never got compiled such as > OpenOffice and KDE. KDE should compile fine for. I committed all DragonFly BSD specific patches to upstream before 3.5.9 release and as result 3.5 branch from KDE repo compiles fine without any change

Re: pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 05:16:51PM +0200, Robert Luciani wrote: > Also, packages with special licenses are removed. Just use the normal upload script and it will reduce the list automatically according to the NO_BIN_ON_FTP attribute. Joerg

Re: pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Robert Luciani
Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 9:58 am, Robert Luciani wrote: >> Alright, bulk-builds with DragonFly -HEAD and pkg-src -current should be >> pretty up to date from now on. (Thanks to Justin's wiki page) > > So: I was thinking I would copy his files to pkgbox.dragonflybsd.org, > a

Re: pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Sun, May 11, 2008 9:58 am, Robert Luciani wrote: > Alright, bulk-builds with DragonFly -HEAD and pkg-src -current should be > pretty up to date from now on. (Thanks to Justin's wiki page) So: I was thinking I would copy his files to pkgbox.dragonflybsd.org, along with some 1.12 packages tuxillo

pkgsrc -current on DragonFly 1.13.0/i386

2008-05-11 Thread Robert Luciani
Alright, bulk-builds with DragonFly -HEAD and pkg-src -current should be pretty up to date from now on. (Thanks to Justin's wiki page) Building pkg-src from scratch took me about 4 days with no major pauses since I was near the server most of the time to catch things packages that didn't want to f