More pkgsrc-2010Q1 build status

2010-04-28 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
2010Q1 is built as binaries for i386/2.6 and x86_64/2.6/2.7. For some reason, I'm having trouble with the build on i386/2.7. http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.7/20100428.0433/meta/report.html I'm cleaning it out and restarting to see if it's a cruft issue. The i386/2.6 binaries shou

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you. :> :> I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than :> rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its :> snapshot distribution in different intervals for archiving purposes. :> This is the one thing rsna

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor->flags & HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi, : :I don't think any body needs to waste time looking at my core dump. : :I had as cron entry : :#Check and restart mirroring :*/10 * * * * (cd /root/adm; /usr/bin/lockf -k -t 0 .lockfile ./hms) & : :now hms was initially : :dfly-bkpsrv# cat /root/adm/hms :hammer mirror-stream /Backup1/Data /

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor->flags & HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >    The dumpsys.tgz file does not contain any files, just the var.crash >    softlink itself.  I definitely do not want you to post output from >    a kernel crash to the list!  That would be too big.  Instead put >    it somewhere where we

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor->flags & HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Sending it to list as per Justin's recommendation : :Hi, : :My DragonFly v2.7.0.54.g0754fe-DEVELOPMENT #18: Wed Apr =A07 10:09:21 :IST 2010 core dumps occassionally. : :I can't update it to the latest version because it core dumps before :make buildworld completes :-) : :Attached output of "call

Re: Core Dump Panic String: assertion: cursor->flags & HAMMER_CURSOR_ITERATE_CHECK in hammer_btree_iterate

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
Hi, I don't think any body needs to waste time looking at my core dump. I had as cron entry #Check and restart mirroring */10 * * * * (cd /root/adm; /usr/bin/lockf -k -t 0 .lockfile ./hms) & now hms was initially dfly-bkpsrv# cat /root/adm/hms hammer mirror-stream /Backup1/Data /Backup2/Data &

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > Yeah, I'm in full agreement with you. > > I think I was a bit misanderstood: Hammer performance is *much better* than > rsnapshot (obviously) but there is no way to easily tell it to keep its > snapshot distribution in different intervals

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Francois Tigeot
Hi George, On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:40:08PM +0530, Siju George wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Francois Tigeot > wrote: > > I think sysutils/rsnapshot does what you want. It uses hard links to > > simulate snapshots on classic filesystems and manages different ranges > > of snapshots.

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >    hammer cleanup only removes snapshots over X days old.  It can't >    distinguish between fine-grained and coarse-grained snapshots >    that you explicitly tell hammer to make.  You would have to remove >    those yourself (if you want

Re: Snapshots ordering on slave and pfs according to freequency for snapshot management

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > I think sysutils/rsnapshot does what you want. It uses hard links to simulate > snapshots on classic filesystems and manages different ranges of snapshots. > > You can specify how much snapshots you want to keep for each range: > > [rsnaps

Re: Hammer clean up doesn't actually remove snapshots?

2010-04-28 Thread Siju George
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Thomas Nikolajsen wrote: > .. > prune softlink-dir >             Prune the file system based on previously created snapshot soft- >             links.  Pruning is the act of deleting file system history.  The >             prune command will delete file system hist

Re: HAMMER:WARNING: Missing inode for dirent

2010-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I am getting these errors when I run undo update.log : :HAMMER: WARNING: Missing inode for dirent "update.log@@0x0001166e7da0" :obj_id = 000103bca45e, asof=0001166e7da0, lo= :HAMMER: WARNING: Missing inode for dirent "update.log@@0x000116a785c0" :obj_id = 00010