On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Dillon
wrote:
>
>
> Insofar as I can tell the site is up, accessed from the outside internet.
>
It is up now.
Last 2 days when ever I checked it seemed down.
Thanks
--Siju
It would be safe to do so. Shiningsilence.com has been running DragonFly
for maybe... 5 years now? I had 1 crash back in the 2.8 timeframe, I think
it was. If you stick to stable releases, you will be ok. That's what
those versions are for, after all.
On Dec 27, 2011 11:21 AM, "Zenny" wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2011 18:05:16 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> What's probably happening is the snapshot caught a flush inbetween its
> directory entry creation and its inode creation. There is probably a
> directory entry for the files in question but no inode.
>
> It isn't supposed
:
:Thanks for the pointer, but again the dragonflybsd site is down (GMT
:08:53:45 Decemeber 27, 2011) to access the link Justin pointed to:
:leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2009-12/msg00068.html. :-(
Insofar as I can tell the site is up, accessed from the outside internet.
Mirror, slightly dated it seems: http://dragonflyweb.evilprojects.net/
Sam
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Zenny wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer, but again the dragonflybsd site is down (GMT
> 08:53:45 Decemeber 27, 2011) to access the link Justin pointed to:
> leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchiv
Thanks for the pointer, but again the dragonflybsd site is down (GMT
08:53:45 Decemeber 27, 2011) to access the link Justin pointed to:
leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2009-12/msg00068.html. :-(
On 12/26/11, Siju George wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Zenny wrote:
>> I could
:
:Again the site is down (GMT 08:53:45 Decemeber 27, 2011). Make me
:worry whether I could really go for a dfbsd production server?!!!
And there will probably be downtime in the future. The machines behind
our web site typically run the absolute latest development code and
we expect
Definitely not hammer volume add, that's too experimental. Soft-raid
is a bit of a joke in my view, since it typically ties you to a
particular motherboard and bios (making it difficult to physically
move disks to another machine if the mobo or psu dies), and as with
all soft-ra
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 15:41, Zenny wrote:
> (http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2009-12/msg00068.html).
you need raid 0, right?
i'd do volume-add if all you need is simple fileserver.
In case you absolutely need striping (to split system's
job between multiple spindles), i'd do na
Again the site is down (GMT 08:53:45 Decemeber 27, 2011). Make me
worry whether I could really go for a dfbsd production server?!!!
On 12/26/11, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Is it only me or others also experience frequent downtime with the
> :downtime. I experienced downtime several times and right
I am just wondering which is better to work with HAMMER. I found
1) softraid with natacontrol (
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/docs/howtos/howtosoftwareraid/) and
2) hammer volume-add
(http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2009-12/msg00068.html).
Both links inaccessible at the time o
11 matches
Mail list logo
