Hi all,
Last time I heard there was someone working on the port. I'd be willing to
test (my dragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
peripherals - keyboard etc are not working with the existing USB stack)
Cheers,
Petr
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:44:47 +0200, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
Last time I heard there was someone working on the port. I'd be willing
to
test (my dragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
peripherals - keyboard etc are not working with the existing USB stack)
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:44:47 +0200, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
Last time I heard there was someone working on the port. I'd be willing
to
test (my dragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
peripherals - keyboard etc are not working with the existing USB stack)
One more thing,
Can you give me some instructions on compiling a kernel with the new usb
stack?
Petr
On Friday, August 31, 2012 18:33:36 Jelle Hermsen wrote:
Personally I just define pi with 4*atan(1). Is there a good reason to use
M_PI1 instead?
I defined M_PIl as (4*atan(1.)) and ran the program. It gave the same result as
defining M_PIl as M_PI. The reason for using M_PIl is that it's a
