On Fri, 02 May 2008 23:28:47 +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
thegraze wrote:
Comitted. :)
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-
ati.git;a=commit;h=f051359ac09c6b9416e39b9ca7d9dc0880aa1557
wow, this is impressive. I suspect that git plays an enabling part
here,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:20:42 +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote:
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Then devices should be probed and if there is a better match than ugen
and if the ugen device is not open, it should be detached from ugen and
attached to the new driver. Do you think this would be
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:42:06 +0100, Jasse Jansson wrote:
Sdävtaker wrote:
I was using a P1/233MMX with DFBSD before buy a linksys router. I got
the linksys router becouse the P1 micro crashed and i couldnt find a
replacement, linksys router (WRT54G) sucks, i got to restart it once
per week
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:15:39 +0100, Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:
Hi!
Im looking for *working* dc++ client for DragonFly. dc_gui2 is NOT
working properly.
Any ideas?
http://pkgsrc.se/wip/linuxdcpp
I am maintaining net-p2p/linuxdcpp in FreeBSD ports tree and it works
great. I have to use QoS
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:03:19 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Reviewing FreeBSD mailing lists was quite challenging, but here's some
issu= :...
Cool. The only problem area that I see is the 'l' option. That
option is (or was) used a *LOT* by people using tar to back-up
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:15:12 +0100, joerg wrote:
Hi all,
the current package set contains the updates for Xorg 6.9. There are
some issues you might run into, e.g. the xterm problem Simon found
(fixed in HEAD) or the sysmouse issue. Please keep that in mind when
updating in the next days.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:34:47 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On 2005-08-17, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:Hiten Pandya wrote:
:
:
: In my opinion, the option to build packages is only useful to people who
: want extreme modifications to their applications. I am sure most
: people,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:54:32 +0200, Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:
As Joerg said earlier, why not rather look at _why_ people love to use
apt instead of pkg_*?
Can't we just try to make our own packaging system (like apt wich is
easy to use) wich could perhaps use packages as primary medium,
