For anyone who is curious, this is the first results I have for a bulk
build of pkgsrc on DragonFly using gcc 4.4. This is on x86_64.
--
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.9/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
On Sat, March 19, 2011 12:01 pm, Igor Gritsenko wrote:
Hello all, I need to use one shared disk partition(non-system) both for
Linux and DragonFly. Which filesystem should I use for best performance?
ext3 or UFS might be at least readable for each side. However, the
lowest-common-denominator
We made it into Google Summer of Code for a 4th year! (yay!)
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/show/google/gsoc2011/dragonflybsd
If you want to mentor, apply here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/mentor/request/google/gsoc2011/dragonflybsd
I'm assuming the applicants are going to be
On Thu, February 24, 2011 5:56 am, Úlfar Ellenarson wrote:
Hi Alex.
Thanks for all the help. I managed to solve my boot problem. It was a
matter of disk serial numbers as was mentioned in prior emails. I am more
than willing to share my solution and would think it would be a good
addition
On Tue, February 22, 2011 7:34 am, Úlfar Ellenarson wrote:
Hi.
My first time posting on this list. My problem in a nutshell is I
installed dragonfly bsd 2.8 in vmware workstation. I reinstalled the host
system that vmware workstation was on and decided on using virtualbox. I
imported my
On Sun, February 20, 2011 4:28 pm, Tim Darby wrote:
The good news is that it's recovering a ton of data! The
bad news is that it's taking an incredible amount of time. So far it's
been
running 24 hours. Is that to be expected? The bad disk had approximately
50GB on it, as reported by the
On Wed, February 16, 2011 11:12 am, Pierre Abbat wrote:
If I wanted a system with every package loaded, and enough space for
recompiling the kernel every month and upgrading the packages every
quarter, how big would it be?
I assume you mean disk size. You'd want more disk space for whatever
On Wed, February 16, 2011 10:57 am, Chris Turner wrote:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/handbook/handbook-mail-changingmta/
our copy (haven't diverged too much)
Whatever notes you make, please work them into the new handbook:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/newhandbook/
i.e. take the old
The uploads are finally complete for binary packages on Avalon. I think
each of the package-building machines crashed at least once during the
process, but thanks to Matt and Mike and others, they were restarted/fixed
quickly.
I've changed the links on avalon, so pkg_radd for DragonFly 2.8 and
With this last build finished, we should have a complete set of binary
packages for i386/x86_64 and 2.8/2.9. I don't know if all the actual
uploads are complete yet; I'll check later tonight.
Original Message
Subject: v12 pkgsrc 2010Q4
On Sat, January 29, 2011 6:09 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Friday 28 January 2011 22:23:14 Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
I don't know what's up with ruby19-base - it dumps core the same way
when
you build it individually. Suggestions welcomed.
Other than that, we're looking good in terms of total
I don't know what's up with ruby19-base - it dumps core the same way when
you build it individually. Suggestions welcomed.
Other than that, we're looking good in terms of total packages built.
Original Message
Subject: pkgbox64 pkgsrc
Here's the state of the bulk build for pkgsrc-2010Q4:
DragonFly 2.8/i386: 5864 packages built so far
DragonFly 2.8/x86_64: 10304 packages built so far
DragonFly 2.9/i386: 3144 packages built so far
DragonFly 2.9/x86_64: All 10483 packages done - uploading now.
The report from the 2.9/x86_64
On Wed, January 19, 2011 8:16 am, Pierre Abbat wrote:
If qmake is not in qconf, where is it?
x11/qt4-tools, I think. I base that on searches, not from installation,
so YMMV.
http://pkgsrc.se/x11/qt4-tools
On Sun, January 16, 2011 3:25 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
Are current ISOs available by BitTorrent?
No, at least not in any offical, ongoing way that I know of.
The most recent version of pkgsrc's quarterly releases is out: pkgsrc-2010Q4.
I'm starting the build of packages now - avalon should be back by the time
they finish, for upload. It usually takes at least a week. Packages for
i386/2.9 will be delayed somewhat, as avalon was where I built them.
On Tue, January 11, 2011 6:01 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Avalon will be down all of this week for maintainance. It is getting
a new storage subsystem. We expect to be able to get it back into a
rack mid-next-week or so.
In the mean the time the mirrors have a snapshot of the
On Tue, January 11, 2011 7:54 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I'd rather not change the DNS, it could create confusion for the
mirrors. And it will probably confuse the hell out of crater and
pkgbox64 too.
We shouldn't have any mirrors pulling from crater. Does crater/pkgbox64
pull
On Sun, January 9, 2011 5:42 pm, Alexander Orlov wrote:
Hi,
recently Rackspace introduced NASA's OpenStack.org as a new OSS-based
cloud
implementation, followed by a great feedback form Dell, Intel, and NTT
Data.
I'd like to know whether there are some people trying to run DragonFly on
top
On Fri, December 24, 2010 5:34 pm, Stephane Russell wrote:
Hi,
I'm actually trying to compile asterisk on DFBSD. It needs to compile
with the compiler option -march=ix86, with x3 (gcc spec). But DFBSD
uname -m is returning systematically i386. Is their a workaround for
that, that would allow
On Fri, November 26, 2010 4:16 am, Eric Bakan wrote:
Here are the results of running the pcca-test framework. Changes made to a
clean install include modifying the sudoers file, installing ruby, and
installing sudo to comply with the framework's README. I just redirected
For those in the
On Wed, November 24, 2010 11:48 am, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I'm accessing a site which doesn't recognize my Firefox and sends code
that
doesn't work. (It does work with Konqueror on my Linux box when I
configure
it to pretend to be MSIE, so the problem's not urgent.) I suspect it's
because
On Tue, November 16, 2010 9:33 pm, David Crosswell wrote:
Greetings all,
My old laptop, an HP Compaq nx6120 is playing up in a number of different
ways, so it looks like retirement time.
What's a good reliable model?
Any recommendations?
There's a number of laptops mentioned on the
On Tue, November 9, 2010 6:45 pm, David Crosswell wrote:
I thought I'd contact the list to find out if there would be people here
that would be interested in assisting me with getting my
knowledge within the DragonflyBSD environment up and running as quickly as
possible in order to achieve
On Sun, November 7, 2010 8:45 am, Tim Darby wrote:
That's when I noticed that loader.conf looked like
this:
VFS.ROOT.MOUNTFROM=HAMMER:SERNO/s0a4j1ta141435.S1D
linux_load=yes
I tried changing the mountfrom line to:
vfs.root.mountfrom=hammer:serno/S0A4J1TA141435.s1d
I don't know what editor
DragonFly was accepted as 1 of 20 organizations for Google Code-In!
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2010/11/announcing-accepted-organizations-for.html
We're 1 of 3 operating systems involved (us, Debian, and Haiku) and the
only BSD involved.
* The background:
Code-In is like Summer of
On Thu, November 4, 2010 6:54 pm, PrzemysÅaw PaweÅczyk wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:38:31 +0100
Paul Onyschuk bl...@bojary.koba.pl wrote:
It's Slang problem. MC builded with this options, works just fine
under localized cons25l2 terminal and csh:
PKG_OPTIONS.mc= ncurses -slang
On Tue, November 2, 2010 7:28 pm, PrzemysÅaw PaweÅczyk wrote:
Hi,
1. Why PF 4.2 not 4.7 or 4.8?
OpenBSD page http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html
has one important remark bolded: In particular, there are
significant differences between 4.6 and 4.7.
Doeas it mean that I would have to
On Thu, October 28, 2010 5:37 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
I maded a bit of a flub on the ISOs, they couldn't boot UP. We
will be fixing that and rerolling the ISOs and IMGs tonight.
Since we have reroll the stuff anyway we will also be enhancing
the install a bit and I will push
On Thu, October 21, 2010 10:37 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Time tends to wear out drives more than the seeking. Dust and grime
from
outside that gets through the filter and material from inside the
drive
itself. Basically just time. You do want to make sure the drive is
well
On Fri, October 22, 2010 1:09 am, Matthew Dillon wrote:
We are still scheduled to officially release mid-next week. I will
be doing the final the MFCs from master on Sunday (as a lot of fixes
have gone in since the branch). All of the big-ticket bugs have been
squashed.
On Thu, October 21, 2010 2:36 am, Siju George wrote:
HI,
I got around 250 GB free on my desktop.
I would like to try out a bulkbuild of pkgsrc ;-)
will that space be enough?
I have some scripts that work as a wrapper around the bulk builds I do;
this may be more than you need, but I'd like
On Wed, October 20, 2010 3:54 pm, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
A long term *BSD user, I decided to extend our GNU package nightly test
system setup with Dragonfly BSD. This is an install under
virtualisation (qemu or Xen).
The actual install went smoothly, but the package install have failed
On Mon, October 18, 2010 9:50 am, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Hi all,
2010Q2 is done by dfly on mirrors? Eg. mplayer is in summary file and
showed through pkgin or pkg_search, but install is not possible as
it's not in mirror.
Some license issues, sure, but why it's in summary file?
Usually, this
On Fri, October 15, 2010 12:52 am, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
That's an excellent reading. It will be great to read more about
technologies in DragonflyBSD. Something like
http://www.openbsd.org/papers ? ;-)
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/presentations/ ? Not quite the same, but if
this was expanded -
On Tue, October 12, 2010 10:52 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I'm running Hammer version 1, and can go up to 4. Should I upgrade, and
how long does it take?
I recall upgrades taking little time (measured in seconds, generally, not
minutes or hours). Yes, you should upgrade - bugs are fixed and you
On Tue, October 5, 2010 1:01 am, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I'm still using 2010Q1. Should I switch to the 2.8 build of packages once
I
:recompile the kernel and world?
:
:Pierre
We won't have 2.8 packages until about a week after netbsd rolls Q3.
In fact, right now we are waiting for
On Tue, October 5, 2010 11:20 am, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I think that when I last upgraded all my packages, it was to Q1. For me, a
package upgrade is a big event, because I don't have much free time, and I
have to see if the upgrade broke anything (I frequently find that I have
to
symlink
On Wed, September 29, 2010 11:42 pm, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
When someone wants to go deeply in some area then there is only one
way - a lot of years of learning and experience. It does not change
just because we have Internet and PR materials from stupid vendors
talks lies. OS is very complex
On Tue, September 28, 2010 6:58 am, PrzemysÅaw PaweÅczyk wrote:
Doesn't it seem to you like being a bit untidy? And, btw, for how long
the legacy will be going on...? With so much changes between 2.6.3
and 2.8.0? Do you really think/know that the legacy systems will be
kept running yet
On Tue, September 28, 2010 4:31 pm, Antonio Huete Jimenez wrote:
Justin,
How would anyone be using amd64 directory for 2.0 if we didn't have it
back then?
Well, no, but if you think about it for a bit you'll realize it's an
example to show how long support can be needed for some people, not
On Sat, September 25, 2010 3:27 pm, Waldemar Bergstreiser wrote:
Hi folk,
I would like to support some sub-projects by a small donation and I have
seen a code bounty page
but it seems that bountys can be set only by a developer. Did you
already considered opening sub-project related
On Fri, September 24, 2010 8:37 am, PrzemysÅaw PaweÅczyk wrote:
I know, and I would expect such answer. No offense please, but for how
long yet such attitude will prevail in Unix community? It lingers from
80s of the last... Cenury of the last Millennium. ;-)
The LiveDVD image (dfly-gui-*)
On Fri, September 24, 2010 9:49 am, Siju George wrote:
Oh thanks :-)
Hope I will get sounds from the VMs too on my hardware. So Iculd run a
Linux VM for flash ;-)
I think multimedia/libflashsupport will work, so you can get your browser
on DragonFly running it. I had success with it some
On Fri, September 24, 2010 6:50 pm, PrzemysÅaw PaweÅczyk wrote:
Hi,
I checked directory tree. Here's a screenshot:
http://pp.blast.pl/www.png/dfbsd/df_04.png
The slices' sizes were suggested by DFBSD, I didn't touch them.
Are the values correct?
The values are correct, but something ate
On Thu, September 23, 2010 5:45 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:So, I expect to have pkgsrc-2010Q3 packages for 2.8 about a week after
2.8
:comes out, if all goes well. I'm not planning (unless 2.8 is delayed
:significantly) to build pkgsrc-2010Q3 on DragonFly 2.6, since it'll
:probably finish
The next release of pkgsrc, 2010Q3, is due out Oct. 1st. DragonFly 2.8 is
going to be out soon after. I stopped the automatic builds of pkgsrc in
the various places I'm building it, as I don't think there's going to be
any changes to really catch at this point.
So, I expect to have
On Mon, September 20, 2010 3:33 pm, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
This mail is intended for the infrequent responders and lurkers on the
list just as much as the regular posters.
What has drawn you to use the DragonFly BSD operating system and/or
participate in its development by following this
On Sun, August 29, 2010 4:17 pm, Guillermo Amaral wrote:
Hi guys,
I wanted to see if there is a PR team in Dragonfly BSD I could get in
touch
with. I host The BSD Show![1] and I'm looking for somebody willing to
introduce the project and promote any upcoming release.
I can do it - I was on
On Wed, August 25, 2010 8:36 am, Dennis Melentyev wrote:
Hi Justin,
The listing of Avalon's i368/2.7/stable/All:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/i386/DragonFly-2.7/stable/All/
[snip]
Seems to be a little bit short...
Is it still in progress? Or am I waiting in a wrong place?
My
On Tue, August 24, 2010 4:35 pm, Jim Brown wrote:
I've managed to make a logo and integrate it with our own distribution of
AQEMU
that we will be using for the lab exam. See the following URL for a
screen capture:
http://sixshooter.v6.thrupoint.net/dfly/aqemu.png
It isn't really a
The 'stable' links for binary packages on avalon now point at
pkgsrc-2010Q2. This means pkg_radd will pull from a newer batch of
packages.
Watch out - some of the newer packages will have newer dependencies, so
you may be in for some number of upgrades to use these newer binary
packages.
If you
The binary build of pkgsrc-2010Q2 is almost done.
Packages for 2.6 on i386 and x86_64 are done and uploaded:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/i386/DragonFly-2.6/pkgsrc-2010Q2/All/
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/x86_64/DragonFly-2.6/pkgsrc-2010Q2/All/
Packages for 2.7/x86_64 are
On Sat, July 31, 2010 11:58 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I'd also like to reinstall vlc, but it's not in pkgin, and the version in
pkgsrc tries to install the libraries for kde4, which messes up my pkgin
packages. How do I downgrade pkgsrc to match pkgin?
The version of pkgsrc you have installed
On Thu, July 29, 2010 10:41 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:On Thursday 29 July 2010 21:06:38 Samuel J. Greear wrote:
: Upgrade to master? full pkgsrc upgrade? What did you upgrade and from
: what version(s) to what version(s)?
:
:Full pkgin upgrade. I updated a few days ago. How do I find the
On Fri, July 30, 2010 1:12 am, Krzysztof Langer wrote:
Usually the problem was with png, atk and glib - those were out-of-date
and could not be updated with out deleting most gnome stuff (in the end
you had to reinstall all apps or even DFBSD).
All this started after redirecting vendor to
On Thu, July 29, 2010 7:56 pm, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
Yes, it's students-only. Don't wait! Start now. It'll be difficult,
but
nothing worthwhile is ever easy.
So I have to be a uni student or something like that?
Yes.
On Thu, July 29, 2010 9:48 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Thursday 29 July 2010 21:06:38 Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Upgrade to master? full pkgsrc upgrade? What did you upgrade and from
what version(s) to what version(s)?
Full pkgin upgrade. I updated a few days ago. How do I find the version
On Tue, July 27, 2010 10:55 pm, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
Also, if Linux wants to import *BSD's block devices,
that's
a Linux problem, not *BSD's.
I think that some Unix interoperability should be a long term goal for
any Unix system. When you have a recognized standard like GPT,
On Fri, July 23, 2010 12:48 am, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I tried with pkgin and got this:
2 packages to be installed: wxGTK24-2.4.2nb16 audacity-1.2.6nb4 (7026K to
pkg_add: no pkg found for 'jpeg=8nb1', sorry.
Could it be pkgin has an out of date index? jpeg-8nb1 is there, and
audacity is there
On Sun, June 13, 2010 12:41 pm, dark0s Optik wrote:
I've installed DragonFly BSD in qmeu 0.12.
Now I want configure usb pendrive and network:
1) How can I configure DragonFly network in qemu.
2) How can I mount usb when DragonFly is into qemu.
Make sure qemu is running with a network device
On Sat, June 12, 2010 3:36 am, dark0s Optik wrote:
I tried to launch dragonfly x86 2.6.3 installation into virtualbox
3.2, but it crash.
The output is:
Debugger(panic):
stopped at 0xc0537b3c movb $0, 0xc070fd34
How can to install dragonfly into virtualbox?
Try a
On Sat, June 12, 2010 3:26 am, dark0s Optik wrote:
How can I mount my pendrive into dragonflybsd?
Stick it in an available slot.
Either the console or dmesg (type dmesg) will show what device it comes
up as - probably /dev/da8.
Mount that device path - 'mount -t msdos /mnt /dev/daX' (I'm
On Fri, June 11, 2010 2:36 am, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Yeah, I don't believe Postgres is to blame either.
During the pkgsrc build, many make instances were also dying with signal
11.
Every time I have tested the amd64/x86-64 DragonFly port, I found out this
segfault problem was a constant.
On Thu, June 10, 2010 4:32 pm, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Installing applications from pkgsrc went well.
Unfortunately, running Postgres is a different matter:
# /usr/pkg/etc/rc.d/pgsql start
Starting pgsql.
seg-fault accessing address 0x58 rip=0x80077037d pid=20186
p_comm=pg_ctl
On Wed, June 9, 2010 4:52 am, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I'm thinking of upgrading one server from 2GB to 6GB of memory.
Since the regular DragonFly/i386 version will not be able to fully use it,
I'm also considering upgrading the OS to Dragonfly/x86-64.
The machine is mainly running Postgres,
On Sun, June 6, 2010 5:12 am, Jan Lentfer wrote:
Jan Lentfer schrieb:
After another discussion I have decided to do the following:
I will only remove BIND from base, no ldns and drill import. So anyone
wanting to have either of the both will have to install them from pkgsrc
(before updateing
On Sun, June 6, 2010 1:49 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Let me make this clear. We need to have basic dns utilities in the
system base that are NOT dependent on the bind or any other dns serving
package being installed.
The whole point is to give users the ability to pkg_remove bind
On Fri, May 28, 2010 3:03 am, Chris Turner wrote:
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 3:48 pm, Chris Turner wrote:
will submit PR eventually..
Please do it - having a bunch of patches for the pkgsrc people won't
take
long, and that's 90 packages that would now build for 2.6
On Thu, May 27, 2010 7:14 am, Max Herrgård wrote:
I don't know how to fix it though, but it would be good to have it
fixed. This gstreamer breaks lots of packages in the bulk build.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.7/20100526.1040/meta/report.html
Seconded; gstreamer is one of
On Thu, May 27, 2010 3:48 pm, Chris Turner wrote:
will submit PR eventually..
Please do it - having a bunch of patches for the pkgsrc people won't take
long, and that's 90 packages that would now build for 2.6, 2.7, i386, and
x86_64, so it's useful 360 times over.
If those patches go in and
On Mon, May 24, 2010 4:42 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
For a manufacturer-fresh SSD configuring only 32G out of the 40G
leaves 8G which the SSD firmware will use to enhance its wear-leveling
algorithms, improving the overall life of the SSD.
What's the wear rate you've seen on the
On Thu, May 20, 2010 8:54 am, Daniel Bond wrote:
Hi,
when redirecting from http://dragonflybsd.org to
http://www.dragonflybsd.org, the PATH-part of the URI is appended to
the TLD.
IE: 'http://dragonflybsd.org/mirrors' redirects to
'http://www.dragonflybsd.orgmirrors'
As I recall, the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 10:59 am, Siju George wrote:
I guess the packages that get installed using pkg_radd are built from
pkgsrc-stable?
Yes - pkgsrc-2010Q1 is the current build.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 10:59 am, Siju George wrote:
I guess the packages that get installed using pkg_radd are built from
pkgsrc-stable?
Yes - pkgsrc-2010Q1 is the current build.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 5:15 pm, Goetz Isenmann wrote:
Any ideas, what I could do before or after it happens the next time,
that might give my some info what's going on?
The same problem on two different architectures makes me think it's the
one thing that hasn't changed: the hardware. Is there
If you have a system older than 2.4, pkg_radd uses an old path to find
files. Applying the changes here:
http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/commitdiff/3d62c9e33361b5901e858332066162cc93afc27b
will make it work with the current layout, and it means I can get rid of
the old top level
On Sun, May 16, 2010 6:24 am, Sascha Wildner wrote:
Yeah, if RCD_SCRIPTS_DIR isn't set in /usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf, then
/etc/rc.d should be the default.
It seems that maybe we should ship with /etc/rc.d set by default. I don't
recall if there was discussion of this before. People will still
On Thu, May 13, 2010 11:54 pm, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
My guess is that in order for this to work with pkgin, Justin would have
to set PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS in the mk.conf that he uses in his bulk builds.
I would have guessed the opposite - that it's read by pkg_add during the
binary install
On Fri, May 14, 2010 2:41 am, Krzysztof Langer wrote:
Hi, this is my first post here so I would like to say HELLO to all, and
thank you for DragonFlyBSD!
I have a problem with installing WINE...
Is it possible to run WINE with DragonFlyBSD?
-o internettransport.o internettransport.c
On Thu, May 13, 2010 10:25 pm, Sascha Wildner wrote:
Am 14.05.2010 04:01, schrieb Pierre Abbat:
On Thursday 13 May 2010 21:10:24 Sascha Wildner wrote:
pkgsrc has a PKG_RCD_SCRIPTS option that - if set to YES in
/usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf - will copy rc.d scripts automatically to
/etc/rc.d.
Does
On Tue, May 11, 2010 1:33 pm, Sdävtaker wrote:
Nice, thanks for the info i will check out the site to see if something
comes up while im here.
Damian
This is a good time to point out Dru Lavigne's 'bsdevents' Twitter feed:
http://twitter.com/bsdevents
She's managed to track down more
Built on pkgsrc-2010Q1.
--
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.7/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2010-05-07 04:38
Build end: 2010-05-07 13:51
Full report:
Built on pkgsrc-2010Q1 and this is 64-bit.
How much of these is too much? Once the quarterly release is relativly
stable in terms of fixes/updates, the builds happen rapidly.
--
pkgsrc bulk build report
On Wed, May 5, 2010 10:13 pm, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
Thing 1:
I've finally almost got a 2.7 build of pkgsrc-2010Q1 complete, so I'm
going to shift the default pkg_radd target to point at it for each
architecture within the next 24 hours.
Aaaand it's pointed. Packages downloaded through
Thing 1:
I've finally almost got a 2.7 build of pkgsrc-2010Q1 complete, so I'm
going to shift the default pkg_radd target to point at it for each
architecture within the next 24 hours.
Thing 2:
Is anyone still using DragonFly systems older than 2.4? I have old
aliases for the original pkg_radd
pkgsrc-2010Q1/i386/2.6 - with correct links to the report.
--
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.6/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2010-05-05 18:41
Build end: 2010-05-06 03:10
Full report:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 7:25 am, Francois Tigeot wrote:
Hi,
I have locally updated mail/prayer to version 1.3.2. The pkgsrc package
is more than two years old.
It now compiles and installs cleanly on DragonFly.
Is there any thing I should be aware before submitting my work to the
pkgsrc guys ?
This is pkgsrc-2010Q1. I'm still waiting on the i386/2.7/2010Q1 build on
avalon, which is about 25% done, and then 2010Q1 will become the default
for pkg_radd.
--
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly
On Tue, April 27, 2010 9:44 pm, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, April 27, 2010 5:04 am, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
We could add line in blinking, red letters Please provide a commit
message ;) This should be possible w/o digging into the ikiwiki
On Thu, April 29, 2010 8:47 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
How do I get a USB flash drive working? I started usbd, stuck the stick in
If you look at dmesg, you'll probably see the drive show on /dev/da8. It
should be mountable from there, depending on how it's formatted.
On Thu, April 29, 2010 9:05 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Thursday 29 April 2010 20:57:22 Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
If you look at dmesg, you'll probably see the drive show on /dev/da8.
It
should be mountable from there, depending on how it's formatted.
No /dev/da8. The last two lines in dmesg
2010Q1 is built as binaries for i386/2.6 and x86_64/2.6/2.7. For some
reason, I'm having trouble with the build on i386/2.7.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.7/20100428.0433/meta/report.html
I'm cleaning it out and restarting to see if it's a cruft issue. The
i386/2.6 binaries
On Tue, April 27, 2010 5:04 am, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
We could add line in blinking, red letters Please provide a commit
message ;) This should be possible w/o digging into the ikiwiki
internals.
Very easy.
create a templatedir
copy
On Mon, April 26, 2010 11:36 am, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
as you might noticed the amount of spam in our wiki increases (at least
in my opinion).
I'm only noticing one spamming event maybe every couple of weeks. Am I
missing more items? I watch page changes through RSS. The old wiki
On Mon, April 26, 2010 9:01 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Hmm. Well, when I think about it careful its more of a bad memory
than anything recent. I do like the idea of having an
easy-to-remember global password that we can just paste on irc.
It might be worth trying that.
We
Pkgsrc-2010Q1 has been announced; it's been available for a bit and I've
built from it. It's there now for 2.6/i386 and about half-finished
uploading 2.6/x86_64.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/i386/DragonFly-2.6/pkgsrc-2010Q1/All/
On Sat, April 17, 2010 10:59 pm, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I updated the repository to 2.6 and ran pkgin up;pkgin fug. It
calculated dependencies, downloaded packages, and got stuck on cyberbit.
The new version is 2.0-nb6. I then ran git pull on pkgsrc and tried
to install it that way. It tried to
On Sun, April 18, 2010 12:10 am, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Saturday 17 April 2010 23:39:37 Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
If it's not showing on various FTP sites, it may have been pulled due to
age or whatever reasons. You could search for the filename manually and
download it, as it's probably
On Tue, April 13, 2010 11:49 am, Ed Berger wrote:
I don't think anyone yet has a proper tool or script to do this
reliably. A while back, when I tried one suggested with rolling-replace
in the dragonfly-digest noted from pkgsrc mails, which probably just
used the source packages. It became
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
