Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
Hi Kris,
Do you think you'd have a chance to load up Windows Server on the same
machine and compare its MySQL and PostgreSQL to modern Linux, FreeBSD
and Solaris?
I dont think there's much chance of that, sorry. I dont have access to
a copy, the test machines are
Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
Hi Kris,
Do you think you'd have a chance to load up Windows Server on the same
machine and compare its MySQL and PostgreSQL to modern Linux, FreeBSD
and Solaris?
I dont think there's much chance of that, sorry. I dont have access to
a copy, the test machines are
Dave Hayes wrote:
Does an objective metric of stability actually exist? ( If you say
uptime I'll take that as a no ;) ) If it does, I would really like
to learn what that metric is. Do you know of any current
low-project-bias work that has been done in this area?
Thanks in advance. :)
It's
Bill Hacker wrote:
Kris,
w/r the http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/mysql.html page
The link to the MySQL config:
http://www.freebsd.org/%7Ekris/scaling/my.cnf
...gives me a 404.
Thanks, fixed.
I don't have even a Quad-core I can spare from duty at the moment, but
I'd like to at
Adrian Michael Nida wrote:
SnipAndRearrange/
The benchmark at http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/os-mysql.png
SnipAndRearrange/
Is measuring 1.8. We're at 1.12 now. I'm sure an updated graph has a
different
trend. Take it upon yourself to redo the benchmark.
Hi Adrian,
Per your
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Sat, March 8, 2008 6:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Dragonfly 1.12 UP performance is about 30% lower than FreeBSD 4.11 UP
performance.
This regression seems strange; I don't think mfs has been touched much; it
may be an indirect effect of something else.
Yeah
On 2007-05-19, Erik Wikström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-05-19 01:58, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 04:46:27PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
A large chunk of the kernel still runs under the big giant
lock, including the light weight processes that libthread_xu
On 2007-05-19, Gergo Szakal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 16:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A large chunk of the kernel still runs under the big giant
lock, including the light weight processes that libthread_xu
uses, so something like
On 2007-05-19, Gergo Szakal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 19:58:24 -0400
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be able to get DragonFly to run on the machines you
were having problems with by compiling it with SMP but
without APIC_IO
On 2007-02-21, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enig03488FB84BA7CEDA5560E208
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I
Hi,
I tried to netboot a dragonfly 1.8 kernel but it didn't probe bge, so it
was unable to mount the nfs root.
FreeBSD sees it as:
bge0: Broadcom BCM5704 A3, ASIC rev. 0x2003 mem
0xf335-0xf335,0xf334-0xf334 irq 31 at device 3.0 on pci14
miibus0: MII bus on bge0
brgphy0: BCM5704
On 2006-10-12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say that I agree with most of DT comments regarding the state of
FreeBSD5+, after having watched the progress (or lack there of) for over
three years.
Taking Matt's reply under advisement, all I'll point out is that it's
not
On 2005-09-02, Toma¾ Bor¹tnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took some time to play with a machine and test ubench scores on it for few
OS. Machine is AMD64/939 3000+ with 2GB RAM
(dual-channel).
I took ubench, because it does not deal with systems other than CPU and
memory which usually says
On 2005-09-03, Toma¾ Bor¹tnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Summary
Latest DFly-preview has best Ubench AVG of 106030, because of 2nd best
memory score (124353) and balanced CPU score
(87707). Also good was FreeBSD 6beta3/amd64 with Ubench AVG of 101448,
because of balanced
On 2005-08-18, Joerg Sonnenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:33:11AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I can control all options from /etc/mk.conf, not the separation used in
FreeBSD by default.
What's wrong with /etc/make.conf for the system wide default setting?
I
On 2005-08-18, Joerg Sonnenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:39:20AM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
Semantical differences, at best, lets be honest. They really do not
affect the bigger picture all that much and if they do, I would like to
hear about them.
Sure, like
On 2005-08-17, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:Hiten Pandya wrote:
:
:
: In my opinion, the option to build packages is only useful to people who
: want extreme modifications to their applications. I am sure most
: people, including me would not really care about source packages; I
17 matches
Mail list logo
