Is it time to get rid of it? It seems like a waste of space/compile time.
Maybe replace it with clang-3?
Is anyone using GCC 4.1 over 4.4?
Petr
It is always good to have an older gcc version, too, especially given
that other BSDs stick to them.
Importing clang is not an option unless you are volunteering.
Cheers,
Alex
On 07/11/11 07:59, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
Is it time to get rid of it? It seems like a waste of
kaffe (from pkgsrc) seems to need gcc 4.1 to build correctly...
-- vs;
On 11/7/2011 3:05 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
kaffe (from pkgsrc) seems to need gcc 4.1 to build correctly...
-- vs;
I would think that's either a problem with kaffe or a problem with the
gcc44 compiler. If it's the latter, the gcc44 compiler should be fixed
rather than use kaffe as a
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas
m...@endeavour.zapto.org wrote:
kaffe (from pkgsrc) seems to need gcc 4.1 to build correctly...
-- vs;
I would like to second to that. gcc 4.1 is needed to build wip/jdk16
since kaffe can be built only by using gcc 4.1 at the moment. (Many
pcc is not a candidate.
Sorry, I disagree, although I understand if you aren't going to be the
one to port it.
Sam
On 11/7/2011 8:03 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
pcc is not a candidate.
Sorry, I disagree, although I understand if you aren't going to be the
one to port it.
Sam
I don't understand that sentence. Are you saying you or somebody else
is going to port pcc into base? A compiler that don't do
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:51 PM, John Marino dragonfly...@marino.st wrote:
On 11/7/2011 8:03 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
pcc is not a candidate.
Sorry, I disagree, although I understand if you aren't going to be the
one to port it.
Sam
I don't understand that sentence. Are you saying
On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I
do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to
support pkgsrc directly.
What C++ software or dependencies has DragonFly? I'm curious.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero
2011/11/8 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado i...@juanfra.info:
On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I
do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to
support pkgsrc directly.
What C++ software or
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:
On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I
do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to
support pkgsrc directly.
On 11/8/2011 7:10 AM, joris dedieu wrote:
2011/11/8 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtadoi...@juanfra.info:
On 11/07/2011 10:50 PM, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
Our C++ dependencies would not be that difficult to overcome and I
do not see why the system compiler should necessarily have to
support pkgsrc
12 matches
Mail list logo
