Re: NFS scalability

2007-09-15 Thread Michael Neumann
Chris Turner schrieb: steve wrote: On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: :Just out of interest (without the time/boxes to try it out myself), do :you guys think this is a "good" solution? I mean, does NFS handle a lot :concurrent accesses well? I never used NFS... :

Re: NFS scalability

2007-09-10 Thread Chris Turner
steve wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> :Just out of interest (without the time/boxes to try it out myself), do >> :you guys think this is a "good" solution? I mean, does NFS handle a lot >> :concurrent accesses well? I never used NFS... >> : haven't pla

Re: NFS scalability

2007-09-10 Thread steve
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :Just out of interest (without the time/boxes to try it out myself), do > :you guys think this is a "good" solution? I mean, does NFS handle a lot > :concurrent accesses well? I never used NFS... > : > :Hehe, I know, using HAMME

Re: NFS scalability

2007-09-10 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi, : :At Froscon (open source conference), I attended a talk about :web-clustering. The speaker described a system with a dozen web-servers, :each of which is connected to a central NAS via NFS to serve files. Of :course the main task of the web-servers is to serve dynamic files. The :speake

NFS scalability

2007-09-10 Thread Michael Neumann
Hi, At Froscon (open source conference), I attended a talk about web-clustering. The speaker described a system with a dozen web-servers, each of which is connected to a central NAS via NFS to serve files. Of course the main task of the web-servers is to serve dynamic files. The speaker used