Chris Turner schrieb:
steve wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Just out of interest (without the time/boxes to try it out myself), do
:you guys think this is a "good" solution? I mean, does NFS handle a lot
:concurrent accesses well? I never used NFS...
:
steve wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>> :Just out of interest (without the time/boxes to try it out myself), do
>> :you guys think this is a "good" solution? I mean, does NFS handle a lot
>> :concurrent accesses well? I never used NFS...
>> :
haven't pla
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:49:51AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :Just out of interest (without the time/boxes to try it out myself), do
> :you guys think this is a "good" solution? I mean, does NFS handle a lot
> :concurrent accesses well? I never used NFS...
> :
> :Hehe, I know, using HAMME
:Hi,
:
:At Froscon (open source conference), I attended a talk about
:web-clustering. The speaker described a system with a dozen web-servers,
:each of which is connected to a central NAS via NFS to serve files. Of
:course the main task of the web-servers is to serve dynamic files. The
:speake
Hi,
At Froscon (open source conference), I attended a talk about
web-clustering. The speaker described a system with a dozen web-servers,
each of which is connected to a central NAS via NFS to serve files. Of
course the main task of the web-servers is to serve dynamic files. The
speaker used
