>> I guess by the end of September you will be able to use the USB stack as a
>> replacement for the old one.
Thank you. :)
The only thing that stopped me from trying out dragonfly was lack of
proper usb support (my laptop keyboard didnt' work).
I'll start cleaning up some disc space :)
gt;
> I guess by the end of September you will be able to use the USB stack as a
> replacement for the old one.
Great, at the point where you feel people should start testing it, i'll
give it a try.
Thanks,
Petr
Hello
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:29:49PM +0200, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> Out of interest, does the new USB stack support xHCI?
Yes it has full support for that, and I at least tested it with a memory
stick.
Obviously having more testers to see whether it is offering the performance of
USB3
ragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
>> peripherals - keyboard etc are not working with the existing USB stack)
>>
>
> Thanks for your offer!
>
> I am currently caught up in getting my PhD submitted. Once that is done and I
> have settled in at my new work sp
not working with the existing USB stack)
>
Thanks for your offer!
I am currently caught up in getting my PhD submitted. Once that is done and I
have settled in at my new work space I will finish the port pretty quickly I
guess. I also thank Sascha for putting the effort in to get USB into master.
One more thing,
Can you give me some instructions on compiling a kernel with the new usb
stack?
Petr
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:44:47 +0200, wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Last time I heard there was someone working on the port. I'd be willing
>> to
>> test (my dragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
>> peripherals - keyboard etc are not w
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:44:47 +0200, wrote:
Hi all,
Last time I heard there was someone working on the port. I'd be willing
to
test (my dragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
peripherals - keyboard etc are not working with the existing USB stack)
What we have so far
Hi all,
Last time I heard there was someone working on the port. I'd be willing to
test (my dragonfly installation is long not used because my USB
peripherals - keyboard etc are not working with the existing USB stack)
Cheers,
Petr
a huge mess
and keep the code maintainable.
Cheers,
Alex Hornung
2009/12/12 Alexander Polakov :
2009/12/12, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au :
Hi all,
1) I think we desperately need to bring our USB stack into reality. Is
anyone working on bringing in the new FreeBSD USB code or maybe one from
other B
I'm pretty sure the FreeBSD fix was the real-mode loader fix which
we've already incorporated in master (and I also think 2.4.1 but I'm
not sure).
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
I'll try FBSD8 and see if my keyboard works.
Petr
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
>
> > The problem with USB keyboards was fixed in FreeBSD
> > recently. Since DragonFly bascially shares the same
> > loader, maybe it's time to sync it to FreeBSD.
>
> Can you point me to a specific commit(s) ?
I'm sorry, I only remember that the probl
> The problem with USB keyboards was fixed in FreeBSD
> recently. Since DragonFly bascially shares the same
> loader, maybe it's time to sync it to FreeBSD.
Can you point me to a specific commit(s) ?
> http://www.secnetix.de/olli/FreeBSD/vloader/screenshot6.png
>
> This is an actual screen shot
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with BTX + loader?
> > It's working quite well for me, and I like the fact that
> > it is scriptable so you can do whatever you want, e.g.
> > create your own menus and so on. (Admittedly FORTH is
> > not the most int
> Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with BTX + loader?
> It's working quite well for me, and I like the fact that
> it is scriptable so you can do whatever you want, e.g.
> create your own menus and so on. (Admittedly FORTH is
> not the most intuitive language to program in, but you
> get used t
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
> 2) BTX: i have been recently bitten by this thing again and I would really
> like to see GRUB + multiboot in, BTX and loader out.
Just out of curiosity, what's wrong with BTX + loader?
It's working quite well for me, and I like the fact that
it is scriptable
elekktrett...@exemail.com.au wrote:
I don't know if non-profit would help us here - people would have to pay
money to the non-profit entity, which would then hire someone (Alexander)
to do the work. Once money gets involved with an official organization,
the processes have to be very clear and v
> I don't know if non-profit would help us here - people would have to pay
> money to the non-profit entity, which would then hire someone (Alexander)
> to do the work. Once money gets involved with an official organization,
> the processes have to be very clear and very fair. We'd probably need
> Matt,
> Hows it going with getting the non-profit status for DragonFly? It'd be
> great if any financial contributions would also be tax deductable.
I was looking at doing this a while ago, though I put it off because of
job searching. I'll see if I can start again after the holidays. We do
h
> 2009/12/12, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> 1) I think we desperately need to bring our USB stack into reality. Is
>> anyone working on bringing in the new FreeBSD USB code or maybe one from
>> other BSDs? How difficult would it be? Lets dicuss.
> 2) BTX: i have been recently bitten by this thing again and I would really
> like to see GRUB + multiboot in, BTX and loader out.
About GRUB: if anyone wants to do it, then just do it. In my opinion
it's completely unnecessary and incovenient. If you would like to see
GRUB as our bootloader, jus
olakov :
> 2009/12/12, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> 1) I think we desperately need to bring our USB stack into reality. Is
>> anyone working on bringing in the new FreeBSD USB code or maybe one from
>> other BSDs? How difficult would it be? Lets dicuss.
>
> I am going to port FreeBSD 8 stack.
>
2009/12/12, elekktrett...@exemail.com.au :
> Hi all,
>
> 1) I think we desperately need to bring our USB stack into reality. Is
> anyone working on bringing in the new FreeBSD USB code or maybe one from
> other BSDs? How difficult would it be? Lets dicuss.
I am going to port FreeBSD 8 stack.
2009/12/12
> Hi all,
>
> 1) I think we desperately need to bring our USB stack into reality. Is
> anyone working on bringing in the new FreeBSD USB code or maybe one from
> other BSDs? How difficult would it be? Lets dicuss.
>
Some time ago I said that I'd like to bring
Hi all,
1) I think we desperately need to bring our USB stack into reality. Is
anyone working on bringing in the new FreeBSD USB code or maybe one from
other BSDs? How difficult would it be? Lets dicuss.
2) BTX: i have been recently bitten by this thing again and I would really
like to see GRUB
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> See here:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-January/081682.
>html
That's not excuse ;). We adopted the code which was rejected by FreeBSD in
the past (sensors framework originally from OpenBSD for example). And I
haven't seen any public and detai
river. Do you think this would be possible?
>
> There is a lot of things that suck in USB stack all BSD's are using at
> the moment. This particular one is one of smallest ones I worry about
> ;).
>
> There is a light though. There is a new USB stack known as HPS or
> usb4
hings that suck in USB stack all BSD's are using at the
moment. This particular one is one of smallest ones I worry about ;).
There is a light though. There is a new USB stack known as HPS or usb4bsd
under development in FreeBSD. This particular problem is already resolved
there as well. A
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Then devices should be probed and if there is a better match than ugen
> and if the ugen device is not open, it should be detached from ugen and
> attached to the new driver. Do you think this would be possible?
There is a lot of things tha
30 matches
Mail list logo
