nanoBSD is a fun to work with, yet very time consuming. There is a ton
of stuffs that is coming with FreeBSD9 like the resource allocation to
jails and HAST.
The new FreeNAS team (maybe ixsystems management) has made some
marketing gimmicks
(http://forums.freenas.org/showthread.php?5291-Is-this-de
Thanks Matt: I have been trying my best to create 3 (12TB each)
servers with dragonflybsd with HAMMER to avoid zfs, but from what I
read below, I have no option than going for a freebsd+zfs (with
nanobsd).
I indeed enjoyed being here and appreciate very courteous and
supportive adopters and develo
Definitely not hammer volume add, that's too experimental. Soft-raid
is a bit of a joke in my view, since it typically ties you to a
particular motherboard and bios (making it difficult to physically
move disks to another machine if the mobo or psu dies), and as with
all soft-ra
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 15:41, Zenny wrote:
> (http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2009-12/msg00068.html).
you need raid 0, right?
i'd do volume-add if all you need is simple fileserver.
In case you absolutely need striping (to split system's
job between multiple spindles), i'd do na
I am just wondering which is better to work with HAMMER. I found
1) softraid with natacontrol (
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/docs/howtos/howtosoftwareraid/) and
2) hammer volume-add
(http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2009-12/msg00068.html).
Both links inaccessible at the time o
