Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-23 Thread Pierre Abbat
Just passed 10%, though the big ones qt4 and kdelibs4 are already built. Pierre -- li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-18 Thread Pierre Abbat
Packages for i386 are building. It's about 4% done, by number of packages, though qt4 and maybe some packages that depend on it will take a day or more. Pierre -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-08 Thread Chris Turner
On 05/08/12 14:17, Pierre Abbat wrote: The problem is that py26-twisted is required for some packages, and it conflicts with py27-twisted, which is apparently required for some packages that it will upgrade later. You might review the python options from iirc lang/python/buildlink3.mk - there

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-07 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Sunday, May 06, 2012 21:10:24 Justin Sherrill wrote: pkgtools/pbulk will build everything, upload it, and produce a report. There's very little documentation, though. I think you can also 'bmake package' for individual items and it will create packages in /usr/pkgsrc/packages. I

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-07 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: On Sunday, May 06, 2012 21:10:24 Justin Sherrill wrote: pkgtools/pbulk will build everything, upload it, and produce a report.  There's very little documentation, though.  I think you can also 'bmake package' for individual

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-07 Thread Pierre Abbat
I ran into another snag: gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/obj/pkgsrc/devel/orc/work/orc-0.4.16/tools' Making all in examples gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/obj/pkgsrc/devel/orc/work/orc-0.4.16/examples' ../tools/orcc --implementation -o example1orc.c ./example1orc.orc ../tools/orcc --header

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-07 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Monday, May 07, 2012 08:56:29 Pierre Abbat wrote: orc is required by gst-plugins0.10-base, which is required by swfdec, which isn't required by anything. I'm going to remove it and see what happens. orc turned out to be required by a bunch of KDE programs. === Building for coreutils-8.13

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-06 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Wednesday, May 02, 2012 22:02:18 Justin Sherrill wrote: My preferred method, when binary packages aren't available, is to update /usr/pkgsrc to the appropriate release and then use pkg_rolling-replace to upgrade the packages I use. It'll take a little bit to build programs, but the amount

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-06 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: On Wednesday, May 02, 2012 22:02:18 Justin Sherrill wrote: My preferred method, when binary packages aren't available, is to update /usr/pkgsrc to the appropriate release and then use pkg_rolling-replace to upgrade the

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-06 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Sunday, May 06, 2012 13:17:39 Justin Sherrill wrote: When packages get name changes, there's no automated way to transition. I assume what happened is postfix-current became postfix and some of the KDE packages were renamed. Looking at the kde4 meta-package, I don't see any of those

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-06 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: On Sunday, May 06, 2012 13:17:39 Justin Sherrill wrote: When packages get name changes, there's no automated way to transition.  I assume what happened is postfix-current became postfix and some of the KDE packages were

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-06 Thread Pierre Abbat
I ran into a snag. I ran pkg_rolling-replace -u -D MAKE_JOBS=3 a few times. I ran into a backup program with a license it didn't like; since I'm not using it, I removed it. Then I ran into this: rr x11/xfontsel - xfontsel-1.0.2nb1 xfontsel-1.0.2nb2 rr x11/xlogo - xlogo-1.0.2 xlogo-1.0.2nb1 rr

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-06 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: I ran into a snag. I ran pkg_rolling-replace -u -D MAKE_JOBS=3 a few times. I ran into a backup program with a license it didn't like; since I'm not using it, I removed it. Then I ran into this: rr x11/xfontsel -

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-02 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 21:06:14 Justin Sherrill wrote: Are you asking about doing a full bulk build of all the packages, or adding/upgrading packages on your system? Both. I'd like to upgrade the packages on my system, but I don't want a long time when the packages installed are partly old

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-02 Thread Edward
On 05/01/2012 12:22 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote: It will On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Edward Mmartinezedward...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/01/2012 06:30 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote: I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at this point for 2012Q1. This may sound like a

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-02 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 21:06:14 Justin Sherrill wrote: Are you asking about doing a full bulk build of all the packages, or adding/upgrading packages on your system? Both. I'd like to upgrade the packages on my system,

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available? Pierre 64-bit build just finished this morning, so it'll be at least a day or two for uploading. 32-bit build is on a machine that has crashed and I don't have

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available? Pierre 64-bit build just finished this morning, so it'll be at least a day or

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Edward M
On 05/01/2012 06:30 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote: I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at this point for 2012Q1. This may sound like a noob question:-) Will 2012Q1 work on DFlyBSD 3.0.2 or I have to continue using 2011Q4?

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 09:30:50 Justin Sherrill wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote: I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at this point for 2012Q1. How long does it take to build from source, and how much disk

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Justin Sherrill
It will On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Edward M martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/01/2012 06:30 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote: I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at this point for 2012Q1.  This may sound like a noob question:-)   Will 2012Q1 work on DFlyBSD

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Justin Sherrill
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 09:30:50 Justin Sherrill wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote: I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at this point for

Re: binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-05-01 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 15:26:04 Justin Sherrill wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote: If everything goes well, maybe a week and 50G, though I haven't tracked disk usage over the whole history of the build. It never goes well. Disks fill from hammer

binary packages for 2012Q1

2012-04-30 Thread Pierre Abbat
Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available? Pierre -- sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera