Re: git: vendor/BIND bind - Upgraded vendor branch to 9.5.2-P1

2009-12-03 Thread Aggelos Economopoulos
Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: commit c40674358ed4bedb23390f50832cadef96754a9c Author: Jan Lentfer jan.lent...@web.de Date: Fri Nov 27 10:06:46 2009 +0100 bind - Upgraded vendor branch to 9.5.2-P1 Thanks to Jan Lentfer we have an updated bind in base. Give it some testing please. Note

Re: git: vendor/BIND bind - Upgraded vendor branch to 9.5.2-P1

2009-12-03 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
Regarding the DNSSEC bug -- does that even matter for DragonFly -- did the DragonFly ever get built with openssl? (I was working on it last year, but I don't think I ever committed simple patch before switched to git.) See thread: Subject: Re: need to build bind w/ crypto support.

Re: git: vendor/BIND bind - Upgraded vendor branch to 9.5.2-P1

2009-12-03 Thread Stathis Kamperis
2009/12/3 Aggelos Economopoulos ao...@cc.ece.ntua.gr: Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: commit c40674358ed4bedb23390f50832cadef96754a9c Author: Jan Lentfer jan.lent...@web.de Date:   Fri Nov 27 10:06:46 2009 +0100     bind - Upgraded vendor branch to 9.5.2-P1 Thanks to Jan Lentfer we have an

Re: git: vendor/BIND bind - Upgraded vendor branch to 9.5.2-P1

2009-12-03 Thread Aggelos Economopoulos
Jeremy C. Reed wrote: Regarding the DNSSEC bug -- does that even matter for DragonFly -- did the DragonFly ever get built with openssl? (I was working on it last year, but I don't think I ever committed simple patch before switched to git.) Indeed it isn't configured with --use-openssl, so